Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Naohiro

macrumors newbie
Nov 22, 2018
10
9
Germany
0E9C04BF-14C5-450A-B64D-00607257D4C2.jpeg


And you should learn to read other peoples comments better.
1.164-1.143=0.021
 
  • Like
Reactions: xDKP

Naohiro

macrumors newbie
Nov 22, 2018
10
9
Germany
Thank you….

Let’s stick to %.
So if I am not mistaken those numbers account to a size difference of 1.84% in favor of the ultra.
Which in my opinion isn’t that much considering the new case size.
 
Last edited:

RufusRyker

macrumors member
Oct 3, 2006
35
23
Thank you….

Let’s stick to %.
So if I am not mistaken those numbers account to a size difference of 1.84% in favor of the ultra.
Which in my opinion isn’t that much considering the new case size.
The screen of 8 is curved. The screen of the Ultra is flat, which makes a difference in usable space. You need to look at the over all pixel count difference, which is more than 1.84%.
 

Naohiro

macrumors newbie
Nov 22, 2018
10
9
Germany
What has the pixel count to do with the screen size??
It is what it is. Screen size is 1143 sq mm on S8 and 1164 sq mm on Ultra.
The watch has gone up 8.89% in size but the screen got only 1.84% bigger.
That’s pretty bad. And I don’t get why.
And you can see this looking at the watch.

But I get it. The majority in here is all over the Ultra.
Me too at first but after looking at the specs and realizing the display is pretty much the same size as the normal watch I am pretty disappointed.
And you can see it just looking at the watch with its thick borders. Just doesn’t look as good as the S8.

Thats just my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lympero

douglasf13

macrumors 68000
Jul 2, 2010
1,782
1,083
What has the pixel count to do with the screen size??
It is what it is. Screen size is 1143 sq mm on S8 and 1164 sq mm on Ultra.
The watch has gone up 8.89% in size but the screen got only 1.84% bigger.
That’s pretty bad. And I don’t get why.
And you can see this looking at the watch.

But I get it. The majority in here is all over the Ultra.
Me too at first but after looking at the specs and realizing the display is pretty much the same size as the normal watch I am pretty disappointed.
And you can see it just looking at the watch with its thick borders. Just doesn’t look as good as the S8.

Thats just my opinion.

I’m assuming it’s about battery life. They needed to stuff a lot more battery into a larger case to power the same screen size for twice as long.
 

RufusRyker

macrumors member
Oct 3, 2006
35
23
What has the pixel count to do with the screen size??
It is what it is. Screen size is 1143 sq mm on S8 and 1164 sq mm on Ultra.
The watch has gone up 8.89% in size but the screen got only 1.84% bigger.
That’s pretty bad. And I don’t get why.
And you can see this looking at the watch.

But I get it. The majority in here is all over the Ultra.
Me too at first but after looking at the specs and realizing the display is pretty much the same size as the normal watch I am pretty disappointed.
And you can see it just looking at the watch with its thick borders. Just doesn’t look as good as the S8.

Thats just my opinion.
Yes, a curved screen vs a flat screen does make a difference. If you don’t understand, fine. The extra pixels on the Ultra should allow for a couple more complications.
 

Naohiro

macrumors newbie
Nov 22, 2018
10
9
Germany
Yes, a curved screen vs a flat screen does make a difference. If you don’t understand, fine. The extra pixels on the Ultra should allow for a couple more complications.
The actual screen of the S7/8 is flat. It’s only the glass that is curved on the outside. It doesn’t make any difference for the display size you are looking at. And the specs are from the OLED panel itself and not the crystal on top.
Also more pixels≠more space.
I doubt there will be more complications. You could but the overall watch face would need to get smaller to fit more complications. Because….. the display only got marginal bigger in size.
 

MadCar

macrumors regular
Oct 21, 2014
226
255
The internet
I absolutely understand that some will like and want the new Ultra for all sorts of reasons. But for a bigger display they are going to be disappointed. For a larger piece of glass / screen with chunky odd bezels as they don’t appear uniform somehow you got it, ditto battery life and better GPS, again understandable reasons.

I‘ve gone SS Graphite as it to my yes looks nice and stylish and with a subtle bit of understated bling. The Ultra looks ungainly especially on a small wrist and unless you are using it as it’s meant to be for more extreme sports then it’s a bit of a miss.

Apple has always been about features, elegance and above all style. The Ultra just doesn’t have any of that to my eyes, I’d love to know what Ive thinks about it, I bet he is having a right laugh.
 

Jackbequickly

macrumors 68040
Aug 6, 2022
3,189
3,278
I absolutely understand that some will like and want the new Ultra for all sorts of reasons. But for a bigger display they are going to be disappointed. For a larger piece of glass / screen with chunky odd bezels as they don’t appear uniform somehow you got it, ditto battery life and better GPS, again understandable reasons.

I‘ve gone SS Graphite as it to my yes looks nice and stylish and with a subtle bit of understated bling. The Ultra looks ungainly especially on a small wrist and unless you are using it as it’s meant to be for more extreme sports then it’s a bit of a miss.

Apple has always been about features, elegance and above all style. The Ultra just doesn’t have any of that to my eyes, I’d love to know what Ive thinks about it, I bet he is having a right laugh.

‘It is all eye of the owner. Everyone has choice. I am glad you picked and are happy with a 8 but I have owned all,the Apple Watches and ready for a change. I lost one of my series 7 due to water damage and I have been scared of getting the Apple replacement wet, ever since. With the Ultra I will not worry about anything hurting it. It does have additional features and I like it.

I bought the Ultra for me because I like it, not to please others. If I find I do not like it I will get an 8 but since they no longer do the Ti with DLC coating, it would be a let down/downgrade for me.
 

RufusRyker

macrumors member
Oct 3, 2006
35
23
The actual screen of the S7/8 is flat. It’s only the glass that is curved on the outside. It doesn’t make any difference for the display size you are looking at. And the specs are from the OLED panel itself and not the crystal on top.
Also more pixels≠more space.
I doubt there will be more complications. You could but the overall watch face would need to get smaller to fit more complications. Because….. the display only got marginal bigger in size.
There are about 7.3% percent more pixels on the Ultra. That could certainly accommodate more complications.
 

darksoul78644

macrumors 6502
Jun 10, 2017
476
250
That’s what I was thinking when looking at pics. Alt of the display is not used on the ultra. It’s to thick for my liking. I only like my women thick. But anyways. I habe the series 6 up for upgrade. Do y’all think an upgrade from 6 to 8 is good. How is the screen of the 8 compared to the 6
 

mebehere

macrumors 65816
Sep 21, 2012
1,104
1,120
Apple says the Ultra display is 27% larger than the SE and they say the S8 45mm is 20% larger than the SE.
Based on that, we can surmise the Ultra display area is 7% larger than the 45mm. 7% larger text and numbers and elements, etc, is a pretty good increase.

This isnt a great comparison because it’s using dark mode or whatever they call it. It hides the bezels. Here’s a better example that shows the bezels.
3BCE9410-219C-4000-97E1-B0753358BF5C.jpeg
 

ADGrant

macrumors 68000
Mar 26, 2018
1,689
1,059
Thank you….

Let’s stick to %.
So if I am not mistaken those numbers account to a size difference of 1.84% in favor of the ultra.
Which in my opinion isn’t that much considering the new case size.
The math doesn't seem to add up in this thread. The 49mm screen is almost 9% larger diagonally than the 45mm and 10% larger than the 44mm. The square mm numbers that have been quoted show the 45mm screen as almost 17% larger the 44mm but it is only 2% larger on the diagonal. The much larger 49mm screen is shown as 19.4" larger.

Clearly this is nonsense.
 

DSTOFEL

macrumors 65816
Feb 11, 2011
1,063
817
Apple says the Ultra display is 27% larger than the SE and they say the S8 45mm is 20% larger than the SE.
Based on that, we can surmise the Ultra display area is 7% larger than the 45mm. 7% larger text and numbers and elements, etc, is a pretty good increase.

Math is hard. Try again.

Explain it, Einstein.
Okay, An Ultra display measured in London and the AW8 display measured in New York. The measurements appearing to happen at the same time to an observer on Earth, will appear to have occurred at slightly different times to an observer on an airplane flying between London and New York. So, not only is there a display measurement difference to calculate, there is also a potential relative time difference between the two watches to be taken into account.
 

Knowimagination

macrumors 68020
Apr 6, 2010
2,228
1,288
The math doesn't seem to add up in this thread. The 49mm screen is almost 9% larger diagonally than the 45mm and 10% larger than the 44mm. The square mm numbers that have been quoted show the 45mm screen as almost 17% larger the 44mm but it is only 2% larger on the diagonal. The much larger 49mm screen is shown as 19.4" larger.

Clearly this is nonsense.
I'm pretty sure you are confusing case and screen size. the Ultras case is 49mm vertically not diagonally. The ultra screen is probably something like 33mm on the diagonal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tomiwah

canyonblue737

macrumors 68020
Jan 10, 2005
2,229
2,785
Apple says the Ultra display is 27% larger than the SE and they say the S8 45mm is 20% larger than the SE.
Based on that, we can surmise the Ultra display area is 7% larger than the 45mm. 7% larger text and numbers and elements, etc, is a pretty good increase.

That’s not correct. The new display is 1.8% larger than the 45mm Series 8. Exactly. The jump from 44mm Series 6 to 45mm Series 7/8 was just under 17%.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EmotionalSnow

Naohiro

macrumors newbie
Nov 22, 2018
10
9
Germany
There are about 7.3% percent more pixels on the Ultra. That could certainly accommodate more complications.
Certainly not. Because it’s just more pixels but not more display area.
You would have to shrink all content that’s displayed ( what would be possible because of the added pixels ) to add more complications to the watch face.
But this would impact readability.
 

I am Sampson

macrumors 6502
Sep 16, 2007
401
127
Plymouth, UK
I think we will just have to wait and see.
I ordered an ultra mostly excited about strength and screen size (hazardous job, not adventurer). However, I think there is an increasing cha ce I will return it. I’ll take it into an apple store and compare against the normal ones and see.
Wouldn’t bother with a S8 though, if I return the ultra I’ll eBay a secondhand steel s7 for much cheaper as can’t see the point of the 8 for me (upgrading from a 4)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.