Think you need to check either your math or unit of measure. 21/1000 of a square millimeter is pretty tiny.You guys didn’t read my post did you?
You don’t have to speculate.
Display is 0,021 square mm bigger on the Ultra then on S8.
Think you need to check either your math or unit of measure. 21/1000 of a square millimeter is pretty tiny.You guys didn’t read my post did you?
You don’t have to speculate.
Display is 0,021 square mm bigger on the Ultra then on S8.
Or you or your source can check your unit of measure. From Apple.com;View attachment 2053844
And you should learn to read other peoples comments better.
1.164-1.143=0.021
You do understand that the information you posted is identical to what Naohiro posted, don’t you? Not every country uses the same punctuation in their numbering system.Or you or your source can check your unit of measure. From Apple.com;
View attachment 2053850
The screen of 8 is curved. The screen of the Ultra is flat, which makes a difference in usable space. You need to look at the over all pixel count difference, which is more than 1.84%.Thank you….
Let’s stick to %.
So if I am not mistaken those numbers account to a size difference of 1.84% in favor of the ultra.
Which in my opinion isn’t that much considering the new case size.
So silly the watch is huge because if case and bezels they should of made the screen bigger in sticking with series 7 horrible Watch updates this year
What has the pixel count to do with the screen size??
It is what it is. Screen size is 1143 sq mm on S8 and 1164 sq mm on Ultra.
The watch has gone up 8.89% in size but the screen got only 1.84% bigger.
That’s pretty bad. And I don’t get why.
And you can see this looking at the watch.
But I get it. The majority in here is all over the Ultra.
Me too at first but after looking at the specs and realizing the display is pretty much the same size as the normal watch I am pretty disappointed.
And you can see it just looking at the watch with its thick borders. Just doesn’t look as good as the S8.
Thats just my opinion.
Yes, a curved screen vs a flat screen does make a difference. If you don’t understand, fine. The extra pixels on the Ultra should allow for a couple more complications.What has the pixel count to do with the screen size??
It is what it is. Screen size is 1143 sq mm on S8 and 1164 sq mm on Ultra.
The watch has gone up 8.89% in size but the screen got only 1.84% bigger.
That’s pretty bad. And I don’t get why.
And you can see this looking at the watch.
But I get it. The majority in here is all over the Ultra.
Me too at first but after looking at the specs and realizing the display is pretty much the same size as the normal watch I am pretty disappointed.
And you can see it just looking at the watch with its thick borders. Just doesn’t look as good as the S8.
Thats just my opinion.
‘We will put you down as a “maybe”!
The actual screen of the S7/8 is flat. It’s only the glass that is curved on the outside. It doesn’t make any difference for the display size you are looking at. And the specs are from the OLED panel itself and not the crystal on top.Yes, a curved screen vs a flat screen does make a difference. If you don’t understand, fine. The extra pixels on the Ultra should allow for a couple more complications.
I absolutely understand that some will like and want the new Ultra for all sorts of reasons. But for a bigger display they are going to be disappointed. For a larger piece of glass / screen with chunky odd bezels as they don’t appear uniform somehow you got it, ditto battery life and better GPS, again understandable reasons.
I‘ve gone SS Graphite as it to my yes looks nice and stylish and with a subtle bit of understated bling. The Ultra looks ungainly especially on a small wrist and unless you are using it as it’s meant to be for more extreme sports then it’s a bit of a miss.
Apple has always been about features, elegance and above all style. The Ultra just doesn’t have any of that to my eyes, I’d love to know what Ive thinks about it, I bet he is having a right laugh.
There are about 7.3% percent more pixels on the Ultra. That could certainly accommodate more complications.The actual screen of the S7/8 is flat. It’s only the glass that is curved on the outside. It doesn’t make any difference for the display size you are looking at. And the specs are from the OLED panel itself and not the crystal on top.
Also more pixels≠more space.
I doubt there will be more complications. You could but the overall watch face would need to get smaller to fit more complications. Because….. the display only got marginal bigger in size.
Apple says the Ultra display is 27% larger than the SE and they say the S8 45mm is 20% larger than the SE.
Based on that, we can surmise the Ultra display area is 7% larger than the 45mm. 7% larger text and numbers and elements, etc, is a pretty good increase.
The math doesn't seem to add up in this thread. The 49mm screen is almost 9% larger diagonally than the 45mm and 10% larger than the 44mm. The square mm numbers that have been quoted show the 45mm screen as almost 17% larger the 44mm but it is only 2% larger on the diagonal. The much larger 49mm screen is shown as 19.4" larger.Thank you….
Let’s stick to %.
So if I am not mistaken those numbers account to a size difference of 1.84% in favor of the ultra.
Which in my opinion isn’t that much considering the new case size.
Apple says the Ultra display is 27% larger than the SE and they say the S8 45mm is 20% larger than the SE.
Based on that, we can surmise the Ultra display area is 7% larger than the 45mm. 7% larger text and numbers and elements, etc, is a pretty good increase.
Math is hard. Try again.
Okay, An Ultra display measured in London and the AW8 display measured in New York. The measurements appearing to happen at the same time to an observer on Earth, will appear to have occurred at slightly different times to an observer on an airplane flying between London and New York. So, not only is there a display measurement difference to calculate, there is also a potential relative time difference between the two watches to be taken into account.Explain it, Einstein.
I'm pretty sure you are confusing case and screen size. the Ultras case is 49mm vertically not diagonally. The ultra screen is probably something like 33mm on the diagonal.The math doesn't seem to add up in this thread. The 49mm screen is almost 9% larger diagonally than the 45mm and 10% larger than the 44mm. The square mm numbers that have been quoted show the 45mm screen as almost 17% larger the 44mm but it is only 2% larger on the diagonal. The much larger 49mm screen is shown as 19.4" larger.
Clearly this is nonsense.
Apple says the Ultra display is 27% larger than the SE and they say the S8 45mm is 20% larger than the SE.
Based on that, we can surmise the Ultra display area is 7% larger than the 45mm. 7% larger text and numbers and elements, etc, is a pretty good increase.
It looks like apple is doing percents by pixels which is indeed 7% difference.That’s not correct. The new display is 1.8% larger than the 45mm Series 8. Exactly. The jump from 44mm Series 6 to 45mm Series 7/8 was just under 17%.
Certainly not. Because it’s just more pixels but not more display area.There are about 7.3% percent more pixels on the Ultra. That could certainly accommodate more complications.