Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

chrfr

macrumors G5
Jul 11, 2009
13,707
7,277
T5 is only rated at 5 Gbps, not 10. Doesn't matter what the system reports it as. The SSD inside is m. sata and not NVMe.
No, the T5 will run slightly faster on a 10Gbps connection than on a 5Gbps connection, even on an Intel Mac, and even if it doesn’t fully saturate the 10Gbps USB connection.
USB connection speed is a function of the drive‘s USB bridge, not the SSD itself.
 

joevt

macrumors 604
Jun 21, 2012
6,964
4,259
No, the T5 will run slightly faster on a 10Gbps connection than on a 5Gbps connection, even on an Intel Mac, and even if it doesn’t fully saturate the 10Gbps USB connection.
USB connection speed is a function of the drive‘s USB bridge, not the SSD itself.
Right, Samsung product page says USB 3.1 gen 2 and 540 MB/s. 540 MB/s (4.32 Gbps) is faster than USB 3.0 (4 Gbps) and is typical of SATA SSD.

It should be noted that a 10 Gbps USB port can sometimes do 5 Gbps USB faster than a 5 Gbps USB port because the 5 Gbps USB port may be from a USB controller that is limited to PCIe gen 2 x1. Both PCIe gen 2 x1 and USB 3.0 can do data at 4 Gbps but PCIe overhead lowers the max USB data bandwidth (maybe because PCIe overhead is greater than USB overhead?).
 

Digitalguy

macrumors 601
Apr 15, 2019
4,643
4,469
No, the T5 will run slightly faster on a 10Gbps connection than on a 5Gbps connection, even on an Intel Mac, and even if it doesn’t fully saturate the 10Gbps USB connection.
USB connection speed is a function of the drive‘s USB bridge, not the SSD itself.
Yes, the T5 is a gen 2 drive (10Gb/s) but is not PCIe like the T7, it's a SATA III drive, so the bottleneck is SATA, not USB. SATA III is faster (6Gb/s) than USB gen 1 (5Gb/s), so it will run at full speed only on a gen 2 or Thunderbolt port, while a gen one port will bottleneck it to 5GB/s, making it run somewhat slower.
Of course these are the theoritical speeds. The actual speed I have measured are a max sequential (with 8 queues and 1 thread) of around 565 MB/s on a gen 2 port and of around 450 MB/s on a gen 1 port.
 

theorist9

macrumors 68040
May 28, 2015
3,880
3,060
For reference, here's the performance of a SanDisk Extreme V2 (USB Gen 2) when plugged into the 5 Gb/s USB Gen 1 port on a 2019 i9 iMac (screenshotted two runs to give a sense of the typical inter-run variation) (could have run it 10x and reported the means and SD's, but that's too much work :)) . Drive is unencrypted (encryption slows things down):

1664761798052.png
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.