Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Dammit Cubs

macrumors 68020
Jul 31, 2007
2,122
718
i actually picked up the 1.6 because i just wanted as much power as i can get in a small package.

Mainly for movie playing but from the looks of it, i would probably be fine with a 1.4ghz
 

highscheme

macrumors regular
Jun 10, 2009
182
3
You won't notice a difference. If a program takes 5 seconds to load on the 1.6, It will take 5.7 seconds on the 1.4. Very small difference.

save the $100, upgrade something else.

Your point is correct but in fact there won't even be that much of a difference.
 

mloffa

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Jul 13, 2009
966
40
Thank you all for the replies! :eek:

I think I'm actually going to go with the base 13in + ram upgrade to 4GB.

This is going to my main computer as a college student.
And yes, $100 is a lot to college students :D

I'm still considering the 11.6in though because it's so compact.
But function over form, right? :confused:
 

Ach111es

macrumors regular
Oct 23, 2010
128
0
Thank you all for the replies! :eek:

I think I'm actually going to go with the base 13in + ram upgrade to 4GB.

This is going to my main computer as a college student.
And yes, $100 is a lot to college students :D

I'm still considering the 11.6in though because it's so compact.
But function over form, right? :confused:

Your going to be staring at that screen for hours on end typing, surfing, studying, possible chatting with study mates.

+1 to the 13. And you get a better batter and processor.
 

rrl

macrumors 6502a
Jul 27, 2009
512
57
It's all about the power density (MHz / cu in), and the 1.6 (62.3) has more than the 1.86 (57). So, just get the Ultimate 11.6.

This was a joke.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.