codo said:If you want/need a computer, like the look of OS X, go for it. You have nothing to loose - if the hardware is fatly, Apple will replace it. If you dont like OS X, install Windows and use that. It's all good in the land of Intel Mac.
It is not very fair to mislead a new switcher, in fact there has been many cases where the user receivers a Mac *new*, send it back for repairs inside of a week, and have it come back with dings and scratches. Not a great way to start your switchover don't you think?
MacOS is generally about as secure as WindowsXP set up correctly, heck my XP box didn't take a huge amount of time to set up (setup account as LUA, switch to Firefox basically) and it is basically as robust as my Mini.
Hell, in fact I'd go out on a limb here and say that I actually do prefer the XP solution, solely for the fact that because I demand greater flexibility in configuring my system Apple reckons that I am a "pro", worthy of slightly more options accorded to me, if I pay the price.
That's utterly asinine.
Anyway, for those who are after two sides of the argument rather than just a bunch of ravings from a bunch of koolaid intoxicated fanbois, hop over to here. I've read it a while back, and yeah, I can certainly understand perfectly the reasons why one would switch, to Linux even.
As to the other poster who could only say LOL to my suggestion of Ubuntu, here is one for you. With the latest point release (10.4.7) for Apple, seems like I get corrupted display issues when scrolling fast in Camino.
MacOS is problem free? LOL.