N nitromaxx macrumors member May 15, 2009 82 3 Apr 13, 2010 #51 BaldiMac said: I think a smaller, multitouch iPhone with no 3G data or 3rd party apps would be a possibility. Click to expand... What's the point of that? Seems like it would be a step backwards in my opinion.
BaldiMac said: I think a smaller, multitouch iPhone with no 3G data or 3rd party apps would be a possibility. Click to expand... What's the point of that? Seems like it would be a step backwards in my opinion.
BaldiMac macrumors G3 Original poster Jan 24, 2008 9,037 11,533 Apr 14, 2010 #52 nitromaxx said: What's the point of that? Seems like it would be a step backwards in my opinion. Click to expand... To address the 85% of the mobile phone market (1,000,000,000 phones annually) that does not choose to purchase a smartphone and does not want to pay for a data plan. Similar margins and appeal as an iPod nano with a 10x larger market.
nitromaxx said: What's the point of that? Seems like it would be a step backwards in my opinion. Click to expand... To address the 85% of the mobile phone market (1,000,000,000 phones annually) that does not choose to purchase a smartphone and does not want to pay for a data plan. Similar margins and appeal as an iPod nano with a 10x larger market.