Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

TiggrToo

macrumors 601
Original poster
Aug 24, 2017
4,205
8,838

Upshot is, the plaintiff feels his iPhone 7 was so super special, clever, and unique to him, that Apple then used it to create iOS 12 and iOS 13.

Worth a cool couple of trillion bucks?

Go big or go home, I guess... 🥴 🤔
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy

Camarillo Brillo

macrumors 6502a
Dec 6, 2019
531
525
A customer is suing Apple for $1 trillion over claims that the company stole his iPhone after he brought it in for a repair
Lisa Eadicicco
9 hours ago
apple store

Spencer Platt/Getty Images
  • A customer is attempting to sue Apple for $1 trillion over claims that the company stole his iPhone after he brought it in for a repair in 2018.
  • Raevon Terrell Parker claims that Apple kept the phone because it had "new features" that were used to aid in the development of iOS 12.
  • Parker's last attempt to sue Apple was dismissed.
A Missouri man is attempting to sue Apple for a whopping $1 trillion over accusations that that the tech giant stole his iPhone and used it to develop new features after he brought it in for a repair.
Raevon Terrell Parker claims that when he brought his iPhone into the Saint Louis Galleria Apple Store in Missouri for repair in 2018, the staff kept his phone and instead provided him with a replacement iPhone, according to a statement filed at the US District Court in East Missouri on June 1 first spotted by Apple Insider.
Parker claims the staff kept the phone "by deceiving the plaintiff knowing that it was the first phone to have new features."
One of the so-called "new features" Parker claims was found on his iPhone included the ability for the iPhone "bypass certain start-up load screen options," according to an earlier filing on the matter that was dismissed. Parker claimed that the feature aided Apple in the development of iOS 12, the operating system Apple launched for the iPhone in 2018.

It's unclear exactly what Parker means by claiming that his iPhone "was the first to have new features." But Macworldsuggests Parker may have installed a version of iOS that was not yet intended for the public, and that the Apple Store employee had removed it upon discovering it during the repair.
Parker also claims that he was labeled as "crazy" during his interactions at the Apple Store, which is part of the reason he is seeking compensation. In the earlier complaint, he listed his mental health as "priceless."
Parker's last attempt to sue Apple was dismissed after a judge found that the complaint failed to state a claim.
Meanwhile, Apple shares reached a milestone on Wednesday by crossing $1.5 trillion in value, making it the first time any company has hit such a valuation, as Barron's noted.

 

mtneer

macrumors 68040
Sep 15, 2012
3,183
2,715
Ughh.. its sad that our intrepid reporters didn't say what these "new features" were supposed to be. I wonder if this guy's court documents details them. I am curious to know.
 

cmaier

Suspended
Jul 25, 2007
25,405
33,474
California
Ughh.. its sad that our intrepid reporters didn't say what these "new features" were supposed to be. I wonder if this guy's court documents details them. I am curious to know.
Nope. I read the original court documents. They say nothing. Just a few hand-scrawled sentences on a form. Not anything prepared by a lawyer. I once got named in a lawsuit that alleged, among other things, that someone flew 2500 miles to break a lady’s house window, and was asking for $400M. These sorts of lawsuits happen all the time.
 

0128672

Cancelled
Apr 16, 2020
5,962
4,783
I hope we get to hear the outcome of the case.
Actually I just read the documents too, and it's kinda sad really. He's claiming that he owns the patents for iOS 12 and 13.
 
Last edited:

0128672

Cancelled
Apr 16, 2020
5,962
4,783
I'm no barrister, but I'm willing to bet quite a lot on the result not being in this man's favour

Indeed ... I've bookmarked the docket to check back. It won't get very far in the system. I see that he's filed a motion to proceed as forma pauperis, which means he can't be held liable for costs of bringing the suit against Apple.
 

Shirasaki

macrumors P6
May 16, 2015
16,249
11,743
:p:DHe seems to like supporting lawyers by providing “much-needed” emergency funds? How generous he is during this pandemic? Wish I had that amount of free money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adib

44267547

Cancelled
Jul 12, 2016
37,642
42,494
Apple has a league of attorneys that deal with ‘behind the scenes‘ with civil litigation all the time. You have to remember, when somebody is suing a company or organization, they’re going to try to maximize as much ‘potential profit‘ for cause as possible. There are obviously ridiculous numbers, but it doesn’t mean it will ever come to fruition either when they settle in court, if it’s even make it to court.
 

0128672

Cancelled
Apr 16, 2020
5,962
4,783
The guy tried to sue someone else for 5 million dollars, he filed a forma pauperis on that one too. :rolleyes:

Couldn't find any of the other ones he's filed against Apple before this one.
He filed a case against an Apple Store in St. Louis, MO in January 2019, and it was dismissed in May 2019.
 

compwiz1202

macrumors 604
May 20, 2010
7,389
5,746
They should be sued over that; McDonald's is the most inconsistent chain with fry salting. Like 1 of 4 orders I get is screwed up, usually undersalted.
There was this girl when I worked at McD that would put like 1/4 of the shaker on. Would rather get too little and be able to add. I get more annoyed by the inconsistency of freshness of nuggets and fries.
 
  • Like
Reactions: konqerror
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.