While it is a complete waste of resources to buy and return because you can't make up your mind, OP is right. Hate the game, because hating the player is actually encouraging Apple to continue offering that generous return policy. You know why? That generous return policy allows Apple to create the second source of revenue called refurbished items. They essentially get to double dip in their own revenue stream.
So while the OP gets flamed for taking advantage of said policy, as a stock holder, the more people buying and returning boosts Apple's revenues, keeping that business strong. Total waste of our planets resources but the only way to stop is to stop supporting Apple which people here aren't willing to do.
And yet it isn't double dipping...
On a return, Apple refunds the price of a new item
Then incurs cost of refurbishing said item
And then resales it at a reduced cost from the original new item
So a perfectly good new item that sold at X price is now sold at Y reduced price
So the net is a loss, not a gain
Even if it is an exchange because of some tiny perceived imperfection (I SEE DUST!!!! whether you do or not)
The new item that is returned/refurbed is resold at a loss
Those who scream they pay a high price and their item has to be pristine (in their eyes and standards), they help create the environment that raises the prices
So hardly double dipping
Apple is recouping some of their loss, but it is still a net loss
And consumers are charged more to cover those who are gaming the system
Yes, the refurb business is good for Apple
But it doesn't change the fact that people are gaming the system
Apple doesn't have the generous return policy to artificially create a refurb business
They have it to provide excellent customer service
The refurb business is a way to recoup the losses incurred by their customer service
I understand there are situations that require returns
But the OP said, "Thanks to Apple and their generous return policies I'm trying the X out again"
That's what I object to, they have already tried it once, and are trying it again, just because they can based on Apple's generous policy
Yes, Apple has the policy
No, the OP didn't do anything technically wrong
But it is still taking advantage of a policy that was designed to provide excellent customer service in ways it was not designed for IMO