I understand that computers are faster then phones, that's not the point i'm making. I am instead saying that flash memory is faster than hdd, and that's the reason that ram is flash memory, is to increase the speed at wich you can open and switch between apps. So it just seems kind of redundant for there to be a high ammount of. flash-based ram paired with a flash based memory unit.
wouldnt it be crazy if the iPhone 5 has a SSD? that would be crazy.
I'll try to explain again. Do not take this the wrong way, but you're completely unaware of how memory systems work. The OS requires a certain amount of memory address space to be reserved for itself. It reserves this space in volatile random access memory, which is quite fast. In notebooks and desktops it can also reserve more space in the form of virtual memory, although the way this is used is a bit different. Regardless of the presence of disk space used as virtual memory, it requires a minimum amount of contiguous address space in ram. Actually it goes further in that some values are simultaneously stored to the cpu cache. It accesses the values from ram on a cache miss. Both of these things are much faster than reading from disks, including ssds.
In the case of the iphone/ipad, they use very slow storage that is really designed more for energy efficiency than performance. Unless I'm grossly mistaken, iOS doesn't even have a system for virtual memory, so whatever is loaded must be addressable within available ram. Even if it did have the ability to cache memory values within storage space, this would result in very slow behavior on these devices as the storage performance isn't there. Not all solid state storage is the same in terms of performance, so it's not overkill having this. It's also necessary as there's no suitable method of turning storage space into addressable memory. Once again the volatile random access memory is not the same thing as NAND in terms of performance or usability. The one thing I forgot to mention earlier in the explanation is that NAND has a limited number of write cycles before it goes bad. SSDs have a number of replacement cells on reserve to compensate for this, but it would be totally inappropriate for something like ram.
I hope this helps
.