They could combine the Mini and Pro Line and just have a super customizable mini tower ranging from $500 to $5000+.
I think the Pro is going to top out way above $5000, B&H Photo has pricing going up to $8000 for the current machine. And isn't $5000 supposed to be the base price of the iMac Pro? In announcing the new Mac and iMac Pro's, I got the idea they were after people who wanted top specs and didn't care how much they cost.
So I don't see how the Mini would fit into a merged line like this. $500 isn't going to be enough to even buy an empty box at their prices.![]()
Knowing Apple, they'll make some aesthetic design like the trashcan and charge an arm and a leg for it anyways.
maybe its just me ;(
Some of us just need an in between solution thats headless.
Putting the 3.1 or 4.2 quad I7 into a mac mini would make a great audio workstation!
Especially with 2 T SSD's!
I'm doing music so my needs aren't as much to run Protools,live and logic.For many years there have been quite a few of us on here who have been wanting something between the Mini and the Mac Pro. Given Apple's strategy of late I'd bet my house that it's not going to happen any time soon. I think your choices are either an old Mac Pro (waste of money in my opinion) or build a PC and either configure it as a Hackintosh or put another OS on it - Windows or Linux. Look at what you really do with your computer and decide - your workload should drive what apps, OS and hardware you need. I decided to ditch Apple and built a Windows PC after selling a 2013 Mac Pro. Got a 6-core i7, 128GB RAM (I run VM's with big memory requirements), and a 1TB PCI-e SSD. I was able to reuse my GPU (GTX 980 Ti) from my last PC and I had a load of 1TB Samsung SSD's that I've put into a storage space. Overall it beats anything Apple makes for what I want to do. Your requirements will probably be different to mine, but write them down before you make any hardware decisions and look at what you really need.
I'm doing music so my needs aren't as much to run Protools,live and logic.
I still think not everyone wants an iMac.
It would be nice to have something more powerful than the current mini that you don't have to pay $5000 for.
But yes for now the Hackintosh makes sense.
For what I'm doing the next move would be an old 12 core mac pro, those rock for music production and can be
had for around $1200. Too bad Apple isn't interested ;(
No doubt it can be done but from what I hear that would be the problem, updates would always be a hassle.So long as you are sensible with your hardware there seems to be reasonable support for Hackintosh online. I've not done it personally as I don't trust Apple to destroy my machine with an update, but it does offer the performance you need for the price you want.
No doubt it can be done but from what I hear that would be the problem, updates would always be a hassle.
Also I wouldn't save that much and the 12 core mac pro can do everything I need.
Right now I'm on a 2012 MacBook Pro quad and its enough for now.
I'd still love to see a kick ass mini!
Luckily the hardware is well built and you can put faster processors in them..I'm looking at a 12 core 3.33It's the issue with updates that's always kept me away from Hackintosh. I've just gone with a Windows PC instead.
If the 12 core mac pro works for you then get one - just don't pay too much for it as they are ancient now.
The upgraded MacBook Pros have some nice I7's as do the new iMacs.
What would you pay if they put 4.2 quad core I7 in a mac mini?
I want to use my own 36" screen and I want 32 gigs of ram and a 1T SSD..
$3000?...I know it would cannibalize the other macs but I still want it!
$3000 for a mini? That's a loaded iMac....