Chip NoVaMac said:I will say that the 28-70 Tamron is a great performer! Love mine on my XT.
Chip, do you have any shots you took with the Tamron 28-70 I could see?
I've seen a few arounnd the web, but none have been that great.
Chip NoVaMac said:I will say that the 28-70 Tamron is a great performer! Love mine on my XT.
Mike Teezie said:Chip, do you have any shots you took with the Tamron 28-70 I could see?
I've seen a few arounnd the web, but none have been that great.
Lacero said:Where are the photos? I've only counted 2 worthy to be in this thread.
For a Picture Gallery thread, this thread suX0rz! Of course, the Lima pic alone is worth the price of admission.
Need more pics!
efoto said:I just needed something to show off that Adriana photo....sadly everyone else has been too lazy to go find pictures of 'classy a**' with cameras....you lazy bastards you.
Chip NoVaMac said:I could have but it would probably gotten me banned, or offended the Str8's here....
Mike Teezie said:Chip, do you have any shots you took with the Tamron 28-70 I could see?
I've seen a few arounnd the web, but none have been that great.
Mr. Anderson said:I have this lens for my 20D and absolutely love it - I find I end up using it for more shots than any of my other lenses
D
Chip NoVaMac said:In the end we have pixel peeping going on. The issue is more of how these look in print. I you want smoothness, then use NeatImage or Noise Image to give you the most from these images....
efoto said:I realize I can reduce the noise if I wanted to....I was more curious to know if these seemed like reasonable noise levels given the shooting parameters. Like I said, I haven't 'pushed' a camera like this before so this is the most noise I have seen before. I have looked at some other images I took at ISO 100/200 and those a pretty much spotless.
I just want to know if these seem normal. They are the native 3504x2336 (8.2MP) so I know that if they are squished into a 4x6 or 5x7 they will probably look fine. I don't really have a feel for this type of stuff much though, just looking for opinions I suppose.
iGary said:800 and 1600 ISO...
efoto said:I realize they're not going to be spotless, not by any means. I was wondering if this is normal amounts of noise given those shooting parameters. I haven't shot such high ISO before....I just want to know if this looks as you would expect given the settings.
I think they look alright, the ISO 1600 obviously looking worse but still usable at smaller print sizes.
Garcia said:No, they are not normal, they are much better than normal. At 100% crop thats really quite acceptable, especially at IOS 800
Mike Teezie said:I was going to say, that looks pretty dang clean efoto.Garcia said:No, they are not normal, they are much better than normal. At 100% crop thats really quite acceptable, especially at IOS 800
A few nights back I snapped a few frames inside my comuter rooom at night with just a desk lamp on at ISO 800 & 1600, and got a little bit more noise than that.
But the room was considerably darker, and I was using the kit lens at f/3.5.
Shots look good to me!
Lacero said:
Garcia said:No, they are not normal, they are much better than normal. At 100% crop thats really quite acceptable, especially at IOS 800