Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

flibberti-gibbeti

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Oct 18, 2019
12
4
New York
Just came across a tweet from a “leaker” about the new silicon MacBooks. Not sure whether this guy is reliable or not but if this is true it’s just simply ridiculous. 20 hour battery life? For $799? What in the...? ?

Looks like A14x is going to blow Intel out of the water when it comes to performance and battery efficiency. Thoughts?

4F401A05-C3E4-42BF-AF3D-1174C2DE27DF.jpeg
 

MayaTlab

macrumors 6502
Dec 12, 2007
320
302
If we assume that the A14x will be an upcoming iPad Pro chip, and that just like previous iPad Pro chips it won't support Thunderbolt, which Apple has already confirmed that Macs will use, as well as already claimed that the Macs would get a specific lineup of chips, then this makes the specifics of this rumour quite unlikely IMO.
I'm also dubious that Apple would release yet another smaller than 13" notebook... every time they tried it didn't stick around on a permanent basis like their 13 or 15-16 Macs.
Provided battery capacity and display remain the same as the current MacBook Air and the chip is just as efficient as the iPad Pro's chips when idling or under intermittent load then I can envision a 15hrs battery life though.
 

thekev

macrumors 604
Aug 5, 2010
7,005
3,343
If we assume that the A14x will be an upcoming iPad Pro chip, and that just like previous iPad Pro chips it won't support Thunderbolt, which Apple has already confirmed that Macs will use, as well as already claimed that the Macs would get a specific lineup of chips, then this makes the specifics of this rumour quite unlikely IMO.

Thunderbolt seems to be an optional component to usb4. This shouldn't be tied to intel specifically, but we'll see what they do. Apple supports things as long as they suport them. I myself am skeptical of anything that mentions a butterfly keyboard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nobackup

flibberti-gibbeti

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Oct 18, 2019
12
4
New York
That's not a "leak". That's a random guy who posts random stuff on Twitter.

Yup. Generally I think the entire leaker community sucks monkey balls and 99% of the time have no clue what they’re talking about but imagine if Apple could actually pull off a 15-20 hour battery life. I just want it to be true sooo bad ?
 

psingh01

macrumors 68000
Apr 19, 2004
1,586
629
iPad Pro gets 10hr battery life, but the MacBook will have 20hr? Maybe if the battery is double the size or more on the Mac. Even the iPad could do that now.
 

MayaTlab

macrumors 6502
Dec 12, 2007
320
302
iPad Pro gets 10hr battery life, but the MacBook will have 20hr? Maybe if the battery is double the size or more on the Mac. Even the iPad could do that now.

The iPad Pro 12.9" has a 36.71Whr battery, the current MacBook Air 49.9Whr I believe, but the iPad Pro runs a 120hz screen with different characteristics while the MacBook Air doesn't, and the latter runs Mac OS vs iPad OS. Besides the MacBook Air AS chip is likely to differ in some ways vs the iPad Pro one and the internal may continue to exhibit fundamental differences. So it's difficult to simply take battery capacity and scale it up as an indication. I'm not sure that 20hrs is realistic but 15 seems very plausible to me.
 

Boil

macrumors 68040
Oct 23, 2018
3,477
3,173
Stargate Command
MacBook - starting at US$1,299.00

12 P cores / 4 E cores / 24 GPU cores - Monolithic SoC design
LPDDR5 RAM Unified Memory Architecture - 16GB / 32GB / 64GB
NVMe SSD (single NAND blade) - 512GB / 1TB / 2TB
Two USB4 (TB3) ports
14" display / 2560x1600 / 120Hz ProMotion / Mini-LED / 4K webcam / FaceID / stereo speakers
 

Jack Neill

macrumors 68020
Sep 13, 2015
2,272
2,308
San Antonio Texas
Regardless if its fake, I would gladly take a 2020 Air with a A14X. 799 seems to low, if an Intel i3 can pull 999 a A14X with almost twice the juice can pull 1299.
 

Bug-Creator

macrumors 68000
May 30, 2011
1,783
4,717
Germany
Fake or not, Apple could pull that off and still have some margin, so the only question is why they would or would not do it.

If they think they could gain some marketshare and more important mindshare with it leading to sucking more people deeper into the ecosystem, they will do it (not that different to the original iMac/iBook 20+ years ago)

If the think it would just cannibalize MacBookPro sales they will price such an unit similar to the 12" rMB.
 

LeeW

macrumors 601
Feb 5, 2017
4,342
9,446
Over here
It says $799 (at least), even if the leaker is reliable, its not going to cost $799, of that I am 100% confident.
 

lixuelai

macrumors 6502a
Oct 29, 2008
965
337
$799 seems reasonable. iPad Pro is $799 base and the components are likely more expensive on the iPad Pro compared to a MacBook.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zackmd1
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.