Lets talk iGPU

[Boil]

I dunno man, I am not a hardware engineer...

So maybe the number of E cores can come down, but anything that has Pro somewhere after Mac needs a bunch of P cores & a whole bunch of GPU cores...

How about if we go with the following:

32 P cores / 4 E cores / 48 GPU cores / 16GB HBM2e UMA
48 P cores / 6 E cores / 64 GPU cores / 24GB HBM2e UMA
64 P cores / 8 E cores / 80 GPU cores / 32GB HBM2e UMA

 

[Danny82]

I dunno man, I am not a hardware engineer...

So maybe the number of E cores can come down, but anything that has Pro somewhere after Mac needs a bunch of P cores & a whole bunch of GPU cores...

How about if we go with the following:

32 P cores / 4 E cores / 48 GPU cores / 16GB HBM2e UMA
48 P cores / 6 E cores / 64 GPU cores / 24GB HBM2e UMA
64 P cores / 8 E cores / 80 GPU cores / 32GB HBM2e UMA

I like this idea man.. just that seems to me a little overkill.. maybe in a mac pro..? I do believe that apple silicon will sure be more powerful then a12z used in the ipad pro.. but that step up is alittle bit too much maybe 2 or 3 years later..? I do hope apple surprise us and able to come out a mac pro end next year with your idea sadly I only interested in macbook pro.. so that many core count dont seems possible.. HBM2e will be super welcome though

 

[Boil]

I like this idea man.. just that seems to me a little overkill.. maybe in a mac pro..? I do believe that apple silicon will sure be more powerful then a12z used in the ipad pro.. but that step up is alittle bit too much maybe 2 or 3 years later..? I do hope apple surprise us and able to come out a mac pro end next year with your idea sadly I only interested in macbook pro.. so that many core count dont seems possible.. HBM2e will be super welcome though

LOL... Yeah, those specs are for Apple Silicon intended for the Mac Pro line-up; iMac Pro, Mac Pro, & a new model, the Mac Pro Cube!