I would probably bet that my 2004 Range Rover gets worse gas mileage than the Lincoln Navigator, but I cant say for sure. I dont drive it all too much, thinking to sell it by the years end.
One thing i can say is that for most people if you can afford the car chances are you can afford the fuel and upkeep on it. It probably costs me $75 to fill the tank on the Range Rover but it in no way breaks me.
Why sell it? Its not the fuel economy or fuel costs, its because i have had nothing but problems with the damn thing. 2 years old and its already had its transmission replaced, the ECU replaced, and the navigation system replaced, Rovers arent made very well imo.
To the OP, my friend has a Navigator and she loves it, its a comfortable ride, have fun. On an off note if you want a 2004 Range Rover ill sell you mine, it has a new drivetrain
Ed
One thing i can say is that for most people if you can afford the car chances are you can afford the fuel and upkeep on it. It probably costs me $75 to fill the tank on the Range Rover but it in no way breaks me.
Why sell it? Its not the fuel economy or fuel costs, its because i have had nothing but problems with the damn thing. 2 years old and its already had its transmission replaced, the ECU replaced, and the navigation system replaced, Rovers arent made very well imo.
To the OP, my friend has a Navigator and she loves it, its a comfortable ride, have fun. On an off note if you want a 2004 Range Rover ill sell you mine, it has a new drivetrain
Ed