Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Hughmac

macrumors 603
Feb 4, 2012
5,997
32,503
Kent, UK
That's a real shame you didn't succeed in your objective with Mint :(
My experience on the exact same model MBA was different in that I didn't try and invoke hibernation, but neither did I notice any screen tearing. Strange, but that was running the Cinnamon desktop.

However when I tried to run High Sierra from a bootable backup it ran like a dog and took 15-20 mins to get to the desktop. I'm wondering now if my backup HD is shot, and I will give it a go at booting on a different machine.

Cheers :)

Hugh
 

LordeOurMother

macrumors 6502
Jul 10, 2014
397
122
A lengthy post follows... :D

I've been forced to concede defeat - a very kind soul devised a measure to activate the hibernation mode but it has to be triggered manually by the user and there doesn't appear to be any way to tie it into the power management options, which limits its functionality. A few suggestions were made on Linux Mint forum but none of them worked. The fan, which is silent under macOS, runs at full speed on Linux Mint - even when there's no activity and there's a vertical glitch on the left-hand side of the screen. Selecting the recommended Nvidia driver rectifies this but as I mentioned in an earlier post, it then introduces screen-tearing problems. Great!

There's hardly a shortage of distros, so I tried a few others in order to see whether I'd have better luck elsewhere. Debian suffered from screen-tearing and the unofficial non-free version that provides "extra support for some awkward hardware" still failed to fully support the MBA's hardware and couldn't access any updates! Manjaro Linux was also unable to hibernate and repeatedly caused the MBA to completely lock up when playing a MKV file that is trouble free with other operating systems.

Finally, I gave Fedora a go and the same problems were present, plus a few bugs that indicated a failure of basic pre-release testing. I managed to come up with a workaround but it struck me that this was a repeat of my experiences with Linux from over a decade ago in that I was spending more time attempting to fix problems than actually using my computer and getting on with doing things that I enjoy. Fedora, Debian, Linux Mint and Manjaro Linux were all afflicted with the same vertical glitch, which points towards an issue with the Linux kernel and the MBA's Nvidia GPU. It made me ponder: what's the point of struggling with all of this when I don't need to struggle with macOS?

When I finally sort out my 2006 Mac Pro, I'd definitely install Linux Mint on it alongside El Capitan because I wouldn't need hibernation on a desktop computer and so it would presumably work perfectly within that hardware environment but for the meantime, Linux is a no go on my MBA. I erased the partition with a view to replacing Linux Mint with High Sierra but this required a bit of fiddling and creative troubleshooting.

From El Capitan, I downloaded the High Sierra installer but it refused to proceed and informed me that the newly created HFS+ partition could not be used to start up the computer. However it didn't give me the option to convert it to APFS if that is what was required. Google is our friend and it led me to this solution that will skip converting your drive to APFS. From the Terminal, I typed:

Code:
/Applications/Install\ macOS\ High\ Sierra.app/Contents/Resources/startosinstall --converttoapfs NO

This didn't work. Terminal reported the following error message:



HMmmmm what's a firmware partition? I don't recall ever encountering this before. After some dogged Googling for answers, I found this remedy that was far easier and comprehensible than what I'd come across elsewhere. Ironically, with the help of GParted on the Linux Mint Live USB, I followed the instructions to reformat the EFI partition with FAT32, apply the label of "EFI" and set the boot flags to "boot" and "esp."

Next, I rebooted to El Capitan and ran the command from Terminal again. This time it was successful, High Sierra installed!

0vgwuM3.png


The only hitch was that the High Sierra installer neglected to prompt me to choose the destination and it upgraded the El Capitan partition instead. Ah well, it just meant that I had to rename the partition to High Sierra and reinstall El Capitan on the spare partition. Only, I couldn't get El Capitan to reinstall: the 10.11 recovery partition software repeatedly failed to proceed.

reinstall-mac.jpg


Every single time I attempted to get the installation underway, it stalled here:

Fix-MacOs-This-Item-Is-Temporarily-Unavailable.-Please-Try-Again-Later-error.jpg


I resorted to my El Capitan USB installer but it no longer appears to work and hangs indefinitely at the Apple logo with the progress bar at maximum. It then occurred to me that I was ignoring the most obvious solution: boot to Snow Leopard, download the El Capitan installer and run it from there. This did the trick, it asked me for the target partition and carried out the reinstallation. :)

7YzX2xN.png


rTVctCL.png


o0H7A8r.png


Initial observations with High Sierra:

We're all aware that the 2010 2GB C2D MBA is to say the least, a modestly specced machine but in the right hands it's still highly capable. Contrary to my expectations, High Sierra runs very well and I didn't notice any decrease in performance compared to that with carrying out the same tasks with El Capitan. All of the programs which ran under El Capitan (and prior to that, Snow Leopard) have retained compatibility under High Sierra.

A major improvement that immediately stood out was drive management. One of my external HDDs has a problematic NTFS partition that isn't detected under Windows and whilst it's accessible with macOS, previous versions were unable to search for filenames using Finder - I had to manually browse through the drive for them instead. With High Sierra this is no longer the case and it's a very welcome development.

Anything else will be shared in the High Sierra thread but I'm just pleased that despite Linux not working out for me, there was a positive outcome to this episode. :)
Interesting you found performance on HS adequate. I have a 2011 Air with 2GB of RAM lying around I can barely use because it's so slow on HS...
 

TheShortTimer

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Mar 27, 2017
3,249
5,638
London, UK
Interesting you found performance on HS adequate.

The performance is more than adequate, I described it as running "very well" and without "any decrease in performance compared to that with carrying out the same tasks with El Capitan." :)

I have a 2011 Air with 2GB of RAM lying around I can barely use because it's so slow on HS...

This strikes me as surprising, especially considering my positive experiences with Catalina on this machine. Have you carried out the recommended tweaks and optimisations that deactivate unnecessary features (animated windows, transparency, motion etc.) that can be a resource hog on low end machines like the MBAs? Doing this makes a huge difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amethyst1

Amethyst1

macrumors G3
Oct 28, 2015
9,782
12,182
@TheShortTimer - Ready for another challenge? I bet there's an OS you haven't considered running on the 2010 MBA yet...

good old plain vanilla Leopard.

(Hint: remove all Nvidia-related kexts before booting.) :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheShortTimer

TheShortTimer

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Mar 27, 2017
3,249
5,638
London, UK
@TheShortTimer - Ready for another challenge? I bet there's an OS you haven't considered running on the 2010 MBA yet...

Before I even finished reading the sentence, I was expecting Big Sur or even Solaris! :D

good old plain vanilla Leopard.

(Hint: remove all Nvidia-related kexts before booting.) :)

I take it that this hint is based upon personal experience? :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amethyst1
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.