Is the M1 Mac the first machine released where the same manfacturer makes the OS, the CPU and the machine?
(Let's assume we're talking about
designed rather than actually manufactured when it comes to CPUs, given that Apple doesn't actually produce the M1)
The original ARM CPU was designed by Acorn Computer in the UK (it used to stand for
Acorn RISC Machine) and was first used ~1987 in the Acorn Archimedes (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acorn_Archimedes) which also had Acorn's own OS. So they didn't just design the chip - they wrote the instruction set... and, yes, it thrashed the then-current models of x86 just as comprehensively - possibly more so - as the M1 thrashes Intel today. Of course, it couldn't run DOS/Windows so nobody cared...
...if you want to stretch a point and unpick the complex genealogy of who-bought-who, the Raspberry Pi probably counts as an indirect descendant (esp. if you run RISC-OS on it).
Then there's Sun Microsystems who designed the SPARC processor for use in their workstations - OK, they were running a Unix variant rather than a totally original OS ...but you could say the same about MacOS (and Sun were major contributors to Unix development).
For that matter, Apple were part of the Apple/IBM/Motorola consortium who developed the PowerPC CPU, used in Macs from the mid-1990s through to 2006.
...so, along with the IBM, DEC, Commodore examples I think the answer is a pretty definite "No".