Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Onimusha370

macrumors 65816
Aug 25, 2010
1,039
1,506
I'm sure others will have already said the same - but M1 Max will be plenty for you. Based on those use cases, I'd even be tempted by an M1 Pro (my previous laptop) if you can get a bargain on one. That machine handled all the 4k 60fps video and 61mpx photo editing I could throw at it. Although my M3 Max is now zippier (especially for advanced Lightroom/photoshop stuff) there isn't much I can now do that I couldn't do on my M1 Pro :)
 

Allen_Wentz

macrumors 68040
Dec 3, 2016
3,332
3,763
USA
Your light workload sounds like a better fit for 15" inch air. The 16" Pro is massive, are you sure you want to lug that around? Even the base M1 can breeze through those tasks without breaking a sweat (that's putting it lightly, they would barely use like 10-20% of a base M1).
Personally I will always happily carry a couple more pounds to get the far better display, far better speakers, etc. of the MBP. Plus having extra power/RAM makes everything run much more smoothly.
 

ThailandToo

macrumors 6502a
Apr 18, 2022
694
1,358
that's a steal - poor guy must have been desperate for 1k
He had tried to sell it for $1700. I sent him links and said you haven’t sold it because you’re asking too much. He replied after he went another weekend. I think people just aren’t buying stuff for themselves right now. And he said he bought the computer and never used it. It has six battery cycles so I tend to believe him. He said he was done with Apple. He lost so much money because he bought it right before Apple introduced the M2 Max. And I said well think of how those people feel when nine months later Apple introduced a superior M3 Max in the same year. Mind blown. I don’t feel bad as I am taking a risk too. There are lots of bad actors out there. It’s always a risk. But the same thing would have cost me $2200 at like $1600 off from BH or Adorama new. And I get far less warranty. There has to be give and take on buying used items especially technology that could have had something spilled on it or some problem not disclosed.

But as far as the OP, buying these M1 Max closeouts new is a far better purchase for the value than buying M3 Max. Unless there’s something you need that the M3 Max does, it’s a no brainer on the value proposition.
 

apparatchik

macrumors 6502a
Mar 6, 2008
883
2,689
Honestly, due to improvements in WiFi, BT connectivity, HDMI version, etc. I would go with a base M3 Pro MBP 16", it will also be supported longer than the M1 (Max), resell value will be higher and for the tasks you mention performance should be around the same.
 

Allen_Wentz

macrumors 68040
Dec 3, 2016
3,332
3,763
USA
Honestly, due to improvements in WiFi, BT connectivity, HDMI version, etc. I would go with a base M3 Pro MBP 16", it will also be supported longer than the M1 (Max), resell value will be higher and for the tasks you mention performance should be around the same.
We disagree because support does not matter really and "go with a base M3 Pro MBP 16"" means just 18 GB RAM. But your points are very well taken and it would come down to pricing and how important things like WiFi 6E are (very important to me personally).
 

sleeptodream

macrumors 6502
Aug 29, 2022
385
811
IMO it’s not the right computer for those tasks. An M2 Air 15” would do all that easily.

The M2 Air would actually be faster for what you’re doing because of the single core speed. All while being lighter and without fan noise, and for ~$1000 less.

The Pro/Max chips are only faster than the base in multicore and graphics, for hardcore tasks or gaming. The single core speed is the same for the whole generation.

See the single core speeds here:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: apparatchik

Allen_Wentz

macrumors 68040
Dec 3, 2016
3,332
3,763
USA
IMO it’s not the right computer for those tasks. An M2 Air 15” would do all that easily, and better.

The M2 Air would actually be faster for what you’re doing because of the single core speed. All while being lighter and without fan noise, and for ~$1000 less.

The Pro/Max chips are only faster than the base in multicore and graphics, so for hardcore tasks or gaming. The single core speed is the same for the whole generation.

See the single core speeds here:
It is not simply about power for the simple tasks mentioned. MBPs have better displays, better speakers, etc. Also note that stronger computers do not use fans for simple tasks, but the power is there if needed anytime during the 4-6 year life cycle of a new box. Weaker boxes are not better, they are just cheaper.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacPowerLvr

sleeptodream

macrumors 6502
Aug 29, 2022
385
811
It is not simply about power for the simple tasks mentioned. MBPs have better displays, better speakers, etc. Also note that stronger computers do not use fans for simple tasks, but the power is there if needed anytime during the 4-6 year life cycle of a new box. Weaker boxes are not better, they are just cheaper.
The Air screen is better than 99% of laptops out there, and most people can’t tell the difference. The one on mine is spectacular and the blacks are as good as I could ask for. Speakers I’ll give ya that but I havent heard the 15’s, and there are a few other niceties here and there sure.

But to me OP sounds like an Air user. By your logic everyone should just buy the highest end maxed out computer they can, just in case. Some people have other things they’d like to do with that $1000 🤷🏼‍♀️

edit- also fans suck in dust that needs to be periodically cleaned out, which most people never do
 
Last edited:

JustAnExpat

macrumors 65816
Nov 27, 2019
1,009
1,012
LOL. Please stop with the doomsday hyperbole. You’re acting as if the laptop suddenly stops working after software updates are no longer released. Your machine is not going to self-destruct once Apple stops supporting it.

There are millions of units out there that haven’t had releases in a long, long time that are still working perfectly well. The “software and security updates” thing is a factor for some….but by and large, you can easily continue to utilize a legacy computer without any problems at all.
I would say this is 75% correct.

1. Most of the software security patches are to stop spare phishing attacks against an individual. The days of connecting to the Internet on an unpatched machine and getting hacked are long long gone.

2. Over time, if a machine isn't updated, websites will stop working. They will stop working because either the rendering won't correctly happen because new standards are always being introduced, or security protocols will change (breaking banking and financial websites).

3. Eventually new wifi standards will be implemented, preventing the machine from being able to connected to wifi networks. Try getting a Powerbook 1400c connected to wifi these days.

Once a machine is no longer being patched and updated, EXPECT to get another 2 years of updates from the main web browsers (i.e. Firefox and Chrome), and probably another 5 years of updates after that for long term enterprise support versions of web browsers, and then another 5 years after that for connecting to most wifi networks.

I think if the MacBook Pro Max M1 is taken care of physically, it should continue being able to be used until the late 2030's/ early 2040's.
 

JustAnExpat

macrumors 65816
Nov 27, 2019
1,009
1,012
IMO it’s not the right computer for those tasks. An M2 Air 15” would do all that easily.

The M2 Air would actually be faster for what you’re doing because of the single core speed. All while being lighter and without fan noise, and for ~$1000 less.

The Pro/Max chips are only faster than the base in multicore and graphics, for hardcore tasks or gaming. The single core speed is the same for the whole generation.

See the single core speeds here:
He wants a 16" display. A 16" display is always going to be larger than a 15" display.
 

Zest28

macrumors 68030
Jul 11, 2022
2,581
3,933
I’m thinking about getting the M1 Max 16 MacBook Pro from B&H photo. Main reason is that I like the real estate of the screen size.

My question is the M1 Max still good with the M3 out now?

Main uses are just internet browsing, office productivity, and some basic photo and video stuff (native apps, nothing professional).

Yes, the M1 Max is way better for this, because it runs cooler and at less power than a M3 Max. Apple has been making the chips more hot with every update.

Ofcourse, it depends on the price. If it is the same price as a M3 Max, then go for the M3 Max. But there should be good discounts for the M1 Max now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacPowerLvr

Chevysales

macrumors 6502
Sep 30, 2019
355
334
I’m thinking about getting the M1 Max 16 MacBook Pro from B&H photo. Main reason is that I like the real estate of the screen size.

My question is the M1 Max still good with the M3 out now?

Main uses are just internet browsing, office productivity, and some basic photo and video stuff (native apps, nothing professional).
ABSOLUTELY!!!

I have the same M1Max- 10/32 (be aware specs also had 10/24 your difference here is video cores) Space Grey- 2TB HD- 64GB Mem...

I love mine though when the 4's come out I'm likely switching just cause I love the black aluminum not because I need it.
I do 4k video along tons of pictures in both RAW, jpeg and heif. I have no complaints. This thing is still a beast and will keep rolling along for years to come. I got it feb 2022 as a BTO and my 3 years AC+ ends Feb/2025 and I will but month to month AC+ as its so worth it.

I honestly cannot see a scenario where you'd be disappointed as IMO you are getting more for your $2500 with that loaded up M1Max than you got for M3Pro....
 

FreakinEurekan

macrumors 604
Sep 8, 2011
6,548
3,422
My old 2016 MBP is still working fine with Catalina installed. It recently got a security update! I've still got a 2014 Mac Mini chugging along with High Sierra, too.
For certain definitions of "recently," sure. July 2022 was the last update for Catalina.
 

sleeptodream

macrumors 6502
Aug 29, 2022
385
811
He wants a 16" display. A 16" display is always going to be larger than a 15" display.
Eh, it’s 0.9” larger (15.3 vs 16.2), not really that big of a deal. I think it’s worth checking out at an Apple Store or BB at least to see if it suits their needs. The extra 1.4lbs to lug around makes a big difference too if they’re going to take it anywhere.
 

tennisboygr

macrumors member
Original poster
Sep 21, 2016
65
77
Thanks for the input everyone! I went ahead and purchased the B&H Photo deal that I had posted. Do I think that I am killing an ant hill with a bazooka based on what my needs are? Yes. But I wanted a bazooka as you never know when you might need to kill something bigger than an ant hill ;).
 

Allen_Wentz

macrumors 68040
Dec 3, 2016
3,332
3,763
USA
The Air screen is better than 99% of laptops out there, and most people can’t tell the difference. The one on mine is spectacular and the blacks are as good as I could ask for. Speakers I’ll give ya that but I havent heard the 15’s, and there are a few other niceties here and there sure.

But to me OP sounds like an Air user. By your logic everyone should just buy the highest end maxed out computer they can, just in case. Some people have other things they’d like to do with that $1000 🤷🏼‍♀️

edit- also fans suck in dust that needs to be periodically cleaned out, which most people never do
It is fine to say buy the MBA to save money, you will not mind the lesser display, the lesser speakers, less available RAM, the lesser memory bandwidth, throttling under heavy loads, etc. We agree some folks should buy the cheaper box. I considered buying an MBA but the very limited available RAM made it not an option.

However it is absurd to claim that not having fan cooling available is some kind of positive feature. Fans are a good thing; they do not run making noise or sucking dust unless demands that would force an MBA to throttle are presented. Even my fairly heavy MBP usage seldom drove the 2016 MBP fans, never has driven the M2 MBP fans and never necessitated cleaning.
 
Last edited:

sleeptodream

macrumors 6502
Aug 29, 2022
385
811
It is fine to say buy the MBA to save money, you will not mind the lesser display, the lesser speakers, less available RAM, the lesser memory bandwidth, throttling under heavy loads, etc. We agree some folks should buy the cheaper box. I considered buying an MBA but the very limited available RAM made it not an option.

However it is absurd to claim that not having fan cooling available is some kind of positive feature. Fans are a good thing; they do not run making noise or sucking dust unless demands that would force an MBA to throttle are presented. Even my fairly heavy MBP usage seldom drove the 2016 MBP fans, never has driven the M2 MBP fans and never necessitated cleaning.
Dude the thing has 64gb ram, you don’t think that’s overkill for someone who mainly wants to browse the web and do office tasks? You really think they’re going to use all that memory bandwidth?

The Air has an amazing screen, amazing speakers, and plenty of performance for most people. Do you tell everyone you know they should be commuting in a Lambo because it’s better and faster and has a way better sound system than their Accord?

Heavy loads in short bursts, like what most users do, doesn’t cause throttling without a fan. I feel no noticeable speed difference between my M1 iMac or M1 Air in normal use. The only time I’m glad my iMac has fans is when I’m processing videos using 100% CPU, which is a rare occurrence and really only saves a minute or two 🤷🏼‍♀️
 
  • Like
Reactions: trusso

OxCxDx

macrumors member
Sep 30, 2019
39
23
I have recently got an Apple refurbished M1 Max, 64gig, 4tb as the M3 stock/orders will take to long for a project I have been working on due this week. I am upgrading from my loaded 2015 MBP. The M1 Max is a weapon!

I have had a look at the Battery info and SSD via smartmontools, I am wondering if the below stats indicate it is decent
  • SSD
    • Approx 598gb read and 484gb write
    • SSD shows power 315 cycles (Am I correct thinking this includes the SSD going to sleep or on/off?)
    • 11 Unsafe Shutdowns
    • 10 hours runtime
  • Battery:
    • 8 cycles
I am thinking ok keeping it as I am very happy with it, but I have also ordered a M3 Max, (still waiting). Just wondering if this mbp has been lucky in the refurbished lottery. Only concered about the 315 power cycles, seems high for 10 hours of use. Assume some would be attributed to Apple doing some diagnostics.
 

JustAnExpat

macrumors 65816
Nov 27, 2019
1,009
1,012
Apple has official vintage policy. Anything after that time is at mercy of the Apple. Sure you may get more time, but it’s always a risk to spend large amount of $$$ on something Apple stopped selling. If it was 1200 bucks, I would buy one. Personally 2500 is too much for me.

Apple's HARDWARE vintage policy does not align with their SOFTWARE policy (i.e. Apple Watch 3 not getting updates).
 

TechnoMonk

macrumors 68030
Oct 15, 2022
2,606
4,116
Apple's HARDWARE vintage policy does not align with their SOFTWARE policy (i.e. Apple Watch 3 not getting updates).
It’s not Hardware specific policy. Apple is not obligated to provide updates after a product is vintage. Now, they do provide updates, but not obligated. Like I said 2500 is too rich for my tastes to gamble on what Apple may or may not do after product becomes vintage.
 

JustAnExpat

macrumors 65816
Nov 27, 2019
1,009
1,012
It’s not Hardware specific policy. Apple is not obligated to provide updates after a product is vintage. Now, they do provide updates, but not obligated. Like I said 2500 is too rich for my tastes to gamble on what Apple may or may not do after product becomes vintage.
For some products (Apple Watch Series 3) Apple does not provide updates even when they were still selling the product :O Again, the hardware support status is not connected to the software support status.
 

TechnoMonk

macrumors 68030
Oct 15, 2022
2,606
4,116
For some products (Apple Watch Series 3) Apple does not provide updates even when they were still selling the product :O Again, the hardware support status is not connected to the software support status.
That AW example is totally irrelevant to Vintage Product Policy of Apple. Apple policy is for Mac, iPhone, iPad, Apple TV and iPod.
Apple will have to provide security updates/software updates for the functioning of the device. It’s a legal obligation if the device is listed. They can do what ever after the device becomes vintage, HW or SW. if Apple doesn’t provide updates, they will have lawsuits.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.