I am still on the fence but leaning towards no. I have less than 100 cycles on my 14” and 16” M1 Pros and they’re already extremely fast for everything that I do.
i think its mostly to lure intel mbp users... honestly even M2 Max and M2 Ultra [MBP/Mac Studios] are ridiculously fast for most productive tasks already...I am still on the fence but leaning towards no. I have less than 100 cycles on my 14” and 16” M1 Pros and they’re already extremely fast for everything that I do.
I'd imagine the battery life would probably be better for real world stuff on the M3 Pro. We really just don't know what the benchmarks will suggest yet, but the M2 Pro already improved that somewhat by adding efficiency cores.I was hoping for meaningful increases in both performance AND battery life... but the max wireless web ratings are the same as the M2 Pro machines, and those are only a marginal improvement over the M1s.
I had it in my head that I'd get the lower end 14" M3 Max but I surmise the battery life would be worse than my base 14" M1 Pro... when fresh couldn't get a full day of work while out and about, now it's down to 84% I'm lucky to get 5 hours so always bring an external battery which weighs over a pound.
So a bit disappointed. Considering the 3nm process I was hoping the base models would get at least 2-3 hours improvement and the base max would do about the same as base from the previous gen.
I'd imagine the battery life would probably be better for real world stuff on the M3 Pro. We really just don't know what the benchmarks will suggest yet, but the M2 Pro already improved that somewhat by adding efficiency cores.
(Unfortunately, the M2 Pro also increased maximum power consumption under heavy loads, so it probably worsened battery life under very heavy conditions. It waits to be seen whether the same will be true for the M3 lineup.)