Haha - as an apple shareholder I thanked myself! Hoping it lasts me a good 7-8 years so maybe I should get AppleCare...As an Apple shareholder I just want to say thank you and don't forget to buy AppleCare.
Haha - as an apple shareholder I thanked myself! Hoping it lasts me a good 7-8 years so maybe I should get AppleCare...As an Apple shareholder I just want to say thank you and don't forget to buy AppleCare.
That's awesome! How did you spec it out?Had a change of heart after seeing an estimated trade-in of over $900 for my base M1 14" which is nearly twice what I was expecting Apple to offer... put in an order for the $2400 14" pro.
That's awesome! How did you spec it out?
For what it's worth, my M2 14" is actually not too bad with battery life. I get about 8-10 hours on lighter workloads and 5-8 on typical moderate workloads I throw at it during a normal workday, and I'm sure the M3 will probably be an improvement over that.
I bought my 14" M1 Max with 64GB RAM and 2TB SSD so I could keep it for 7-10 years. It was on sale for $2600 with AppleCare+ included from B&H, where I get the sales tax refunded. It's more power than I need now, but room to grow never hurts and it's been a lovely upgrade from my 2016 mid-range i7 with 16/512.
I have a similar setup with a M1 Air 16gb Memory and 2TB. I do real estate photography and like you would appreciate more storage beyond the 2TB without the need for an external drive. The 14" is enticing for performance but man the Air has been a dream coming from a larger 15" MacBook Pro. lol!M1 MBP13 owner here (16GB/2TB). Definitely staying put unless/until they reduce the form factor, or until MBA gets 4TB storage. As a photography and graphics professional who travels, my primary need is local storage. 14 inch is too bulky for travel together with camera gear. Most of my work is done on an external monitor 'back home' so the improved screen is not necessary.
Agreed. right now it’s doing everything I need and it still has a good amount of overhead for future needs.My M1 Macbook Pro can do everything I need it to, if I'm going to upgrade it would have to be for a Mac Studio, as I don't really need a laptop, I just got it before everything else was released
You are correct, I meant to write 2 not 3--sorry about that.
Yeah, I'm still undecided about the 16 and I take your point about it being heavier. I don't travel a lot with my MBP so maybe carrying it around on those limited occasions wouldn't be a huge deal in comparison to the extra screen real estate gained. My eyesight has declined a bit in the past few years making bigger screens more attractive sooner than I had planned.
Yea it waits to be seen how the 6+6 lineup performs. My guess is that it will probably be fairly comparable to the M2 Pro (unbinned one) in CPU benchmarks, which is still a sizable bump from the M1 but isn't necessarily game changing. There are fewer P-cores, but supposedly they're each about 15% faster than the M2 (according to Apple's benchmarks, that is).Just got that config with no adjustments. I'm second guessing the decision as I missed the bit about the pro swapping 2 perf cores for 2 efficiency cores. Apple's slides show it has a similar 20% compute gain over the M1 Pro as did the M2 Pro. I may just cancel to see how reviews and benchmarks bear out the real benefits.
Because the Max goes in opposite direction - it still has 4 eff cores, but adds 4 or 6 more perf cores, it sees a much greater increase in compute. The TOL Max slide showed 80% increase in compute over the M1 Max. I imagine the battery life is going to take a big hit for either Max config though.
I've seen some youtubers surmise these wonky configs may have to do with poor initial chip yields leading to creative binning, and in particular the Pro swapping cores to improve yields to improve the per unit cost for that chip. The next 3Ne update should address all that. So yeah... might sit this round out if it's not a solid bump in practice.
Well…I pulled the trigger! Main reason was to go from 14 to 16.