Dear Apple,Maybe the MacBook Air should have been made out of carbon fibre to reduce the weight so that the weight difference is more easily noticeable.
Please make a $6000 MacBook Air.
Sincerely,
Grumpy Forum Poster
Dear Apple,Maybe the MacBook Air should have been made out of carbon fibre to reduce the weight so that the weight difference is more easily noticeable.
Yep. I bought my MBA over a 14" MBP specifically because of the difference in weight. I travel a lot for work and every little bit helps. I don't need the power of the MBP, but while I loved the screen and smoothness of 120Hz, I ultimately went with my Air because I felt the MBP was noticeably heavier.
Data point of one of course, but we're out there!![]()
There is your problem, I make sure I only have to make connections at tiny antiquated airports.The 12" MB also appeals to me (underpowered though it may have been) for that exact same reason; when dashing through one of those massive modern airports in order to catch a tight connection, portability really matters (at least, it does for me), and thus, portability is a huge consideration (for me) whenever I think about buying a laptop.
And yes, "every little bit helps": Very much so.
Not always - or, even usually - my choice or decision.There is your problem, I make sure I only have to make connections at tiny antiquated airports.
No it is notI honestly cannot tell the difference in weight between my 13" Intel (10nm with 4 TB ports) MacBook Pro and my M2 MacBook Air. The only way to know I have a M2 MacBook Air in my hand is because it is thinner.
Maybe the MacBook Air should have been made out of carbon fibre to reduce the weight so that the weight difference is more easily noticeable.
I was only jokingNot always - or, even usually - my choice or decision.
However, what does lie within my decision making is the weight of the laptop, and, for me, portability is a key consideration when selecting one.
I loved the 11" MBA, and treated myself to a maxed out CTO version, which, quite literally, travelled the world, to work environments across three continents.
if Apple is indeed brings 15" Mba to the table, then there is room for the 12.2" Mba with the M3 that goes with the binned and N3e SoC in it not to lose too many battery life compared to the current M macsAs a frequent traveler. I agree that the air is too heavy. I had the 12inch for years and the portability is such an amazing difference. I wish they would bring back that form factor
I was only joking![]()
This is true. I wish it wasn't. I think the current MacBook Air should assume the role of the MacBook and the MacBook Air should be a premium device within range of the price of a MacBook Pro but focused on ultra-portability and high quality materials and design. I'm thinking of a MacBook Air with a 12" and 14" or 13" and 15" display size, using ultra-lightweight components, OLED 120Hz displays, with more RAM than the standard M chip package offers. So what I would do next year is have a MacBook Air with M3 chip, 16GB base RAM, 32GB option, 1TB standard SSD, up to 4TB option, OLED ProMotion display, Dynamic Island instead of notch (we know they can do this on OLED), and make it as thin and light as possible. The M3 should help with that as it's going to be a lot more efficient on 3nm node.The MacBook Air has the double role of being the thin-and-light and the entry-level portable Mac. The second role doesn't allow for more expensive materials. How much would it save anyhow?
Sorry about that, as you mentioned, one rarely has a choice when connecting flightsHumour doesn't always travel well online, I'm afraid.
I didn't know whether you were joking or not, but, no problem.
Sorry about that, as you mentioned, one rarely has a choice when connecting flights
Yah, and make the screen smaller and put in crappy speakers, use a teeny tiny battery because - lightness is so much better than a sound quality, screen size and battery lifeToo heavy for a “thin and light” laptop in comparison to the 13” MBP. The MBA has the thinness but not the lightness.
Additional weight reductions can be made with more premium materials such as Carbon fibre or Magnesium.
I think Apple is just cheap. They have a manufacturing process for aluminum that is optimized and they'd rather not look at alternative materials. I share your concern. In this day and age a 13" laptop should be sub 2.5 lb.Additional weight reductions can be made with more premium materials such as Carbon fibre or Magnesium.
It is noticeable. If I remember correctly from my psychophysics class, the Weber fraction for weight was about 0,03; so if for a weight of 1,24kg; you'd notice a difference of about 37,2 grammes... he's making **** up to complain.I'd love a carbon fiber MacBook Air but it would add substantially to the price and most people wouldn't be thrilled to pay even more for the cheapest laptop that Apple sells.
Also, I don't see how 0.4 lbs (180 g) isn't noticeable when the total weight of the M2 MacBook Air 2.7 lbs (1.24 kg).