Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Yep. I bought my MBA over a 14" MBP specifically because of the difference in weight. I travel a lot for work and every little bit helps. I don't need the power of the MBP, but while I loved the screen and smoothness of 120Hz, I ultimately went with my Air because I felt the MBP was noticeably heavier.

Data point of one of course, but we're out there! :)

The 12" MB also appeals to me (underpowered though it may have been) for that exact same reason; when dashing through one of those massive modern airports in order to catch a tight connection, portability really matters (at least, it does for me), and thus, portability is a huge consideration (for me) whenever I think about buying a laptop.

And yes, "every little bit helps": Very much so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Glacier1
The 12" MB also appeals to me (underpowered though it may have been) for that exact same reason; when dashing through one of those massive modern airports in order to catch a tight connection, portability really matters (at least, it does for me), and thus, portability is a huge consideration (for me) whenever I think about buying a laptop.

And yes, "every little bit helps": Very much so.
There is your problem, I make sure I only have to make connections at tiny antiquated airports.
 
There is your problem, I make sure I only have to make connections at tiny antiquated airports.
Not always - or, even usually - my choice or decision.

However, what does lie within my decision making is the weight of the laptop, and, for me, portability is a key consideration when selecting one.

I loved the 11" MBA, and treated myself to a maxed out CTO version, which, quite literally, travelled the world, to work environments across three continents.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Glacier1 and jchap
I honestly cannot tell the difference in weight between my 13" Intel (10nm with 4 TB ports) MacBook Pro and my M2 MacBook Air. The only way to know I have a M2 MacBook Air in my hand is because it is thinner.

Maybe the MacBook Air should have been made out of carbon fibre to reduce the weight so that the weight difference is more easily noticeable.
No it is not :) Reading your comment history is pretty funny, you are like crazy conspiraciest and pro RuZZia fanatic but for Apple things.
 
As much as people are laughing about this, I think the marketing name "Air" makes it seem like it would weigh less than it does. I handed it to a friend of mine who is looking to replace an old 13" MBP and his first comment was "if it's an Air, why is it so heavy?!"

Also the squared off form factor vs. the taper of the prior M1 Air makes it seem bulkier than it is.
 
As a frequent traveler. I agree that the air is too heavy. I had the 12inch for years and the portability is such an amazing difference. I wish they would bring back that form factor
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe
Let carbon fibre to the elite of elite like F1 etc, it has no place here...Dell is using "carbon fibre" in just a marketing way, that is not unibody carbon fibre because it cant be if you know how carbon fibre has to be build
Magnesium it is lighter but more garbage, i still have a microsoft surface around my life and it bends a lot more
So you cannot make too much lighter and thinner without big compromises, even with apple silicon
 
I wonder how people could travel and love the first Mba generations that were heavier...if you want thin and light then go the old route and take a peace of paper, there is no light+thin+performance+battery life to compete with the M2 Mba out there, none and you want to take the crown from it for an extra 200grams or so..
 
Not always - or, even usually - my choice or decision.

However, what does lie within my decision making is the weight of the laptop, and, for me, portability is a key consideration when selecting one.

I loved the 11" MBA, and treated myself to a maxed out CTO version, which, quite literally, travelled the world, to work environments across three continents.
I was only joking :)
 
As a frequent traveler. I agree that the air is too heavy. I had the 12inch for years and the portability is such an amazing difference. I wish they would bring back that form factor
if Apple is indeed brings 15" Mba to the table, then there is room for the 12.2" Mba with the M3 that goes with the binned and N3e SoC in it not to lose too many battery life compared to the current M macs
 
The MacBook Air has the double role of being the thin-and-light and the entry-level portable Mac. The second role doesn't allow for more expensive materials. How much would it save anyhow?
This is true. I wish it wasn't. I think the current MacBook Air should assume the role of the MacBook and the MacBook Air should be a premium device within range of the price of a MacBook Pro but focused on ultra-portability and high quality materials and design. I'm thinking of a MacBook Air with a 12" and 14" or 13" and 15" display size, using ultra-lightweight components, OLED 120Hz displays, with more RAM than the standard M chip package offers. So what I would do next year is have a MacBook Air with M3 chip, 16GB base RAM, 32GB option, 1TB standard SSD, up to 4TB option, OLED ProMotion display, Dynamic Island instead of notch (we know they can do this on OLED), and make it as thin and light as possible. The M3 should help with that as it's going to be a lot more efficient on 3nm node.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Somian
Sorry about that, as you mentioned, one rarely has a choice when connecting flights

No problem.

I misunderstood.

However, on the wider point of the thread, what may seem to be small differences in weight really can make a difference to one's experience.

I understand that for many on this thread, it is either not an issue, or they don't perceive it as one.

Nevertheless, for me, as a short, middle aged woman, the weight and portability of a computer does matter, actually, it matters hugely.

Personally, I would love to see Apple introduce a new version of the 12" MB, one where the issues that plagued the earlier (exquisitely elegant, and wonderfully portable) model have been addressed, and where it has been designed to have more than adequate power for the needs of those who choose to use it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Glacier1
I do agree that Apple should have gone for a weight similar to the 2017 12” MacBook (about 2lbs.) but they were obviously prioritizing performance and thermals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
To me the MBA M2 is quite light. Having used the Osborne 1, I really appreciate the weight reduction. That Osborne 1 weighed almost 25 pounds. Yes, I made a few trips on the airplane with that suitcase disguised as a computer.

1920px-Osborne_1_open.jpg
 
Too heavy for a “thin and light” laptop in comparison to the 13” MBP. The MBA has the thinness but not the lightness.

Additional weight reductions can be made with more premium materials such as Carbon fibre or Magnesium.
Yah, and make the screen smaller and put in crappy speakers, use a teeny tiny battery because - lightness is so much better than a sound quality, screen size and battery life
 
You could try using the compare tool and you would know that the M2 is magically .1 pounds lighter than the M1 despite being larger, having better battery life and better speakers. It is also .3 pounds or 10% lighter than the 13 MBP despite having a larger screen
 
  • Like
Reactions: NoGood@Usernames
Additional weight reductions can be made with more premium materials such as Carbon fibre or Magnesium.
I think Apple is just cheap. They have a manufacturing process for aluminum that is optimized and they'd rather not look at alternative materials. I share your concern. In this day and age a 13" laptop should be sub 2.5 lb.
 
I'd love a carbon fiber MacBook Air but it would add substantially to the price and most people wouldn't be thrilled to pay even more for the cheapest laptop that Apple sells.

Also, I don't see how 0.4 lbs (180 g) isn't noticeable when the total weight of the M2 MacBook Air 2.7 lbs (1.24 kg).
It is noticeable. If I remember correctly from my psychophysics class, the Weber fraction for weight was about 0,03; so if for a weight of 1,24kg; you'd notice a difference of about 37,2 grammes... he's making **** up to complain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jdb8167
If not carbon fiber then magnesium alloy which is 20% denser than carbon fiber but 33% lighter than aluminum. That should put the laptop at slightly above 2# or allow for larger capacity battery.
 
It's a computer that you can pick up flat with only your thumb and index finger, how much lighter does it need to get?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falhófnir
Only if living in a bubble otherwise it's relatively hefty for a basic clamshell. Spoiled by Surface Pro X which feels lighter while having additional touch screen, pen stored in keyboard, built-in kickstand, better webcam, replaceable storage, etc. Benefit of lighter is being able to carry a companion tablet for second screen instead of constantly command-tabbing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VaruLV
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.