I swear since covid and everyone being at home more, they just find more reason to complain over everything
Great post and a very good point here.So if you somehow have a workload that is pegging the CPU at 100%, or a combination of GPU + CPU that equals the same thermal output, for 15-20 minutes STRAIGHT, your performance STILL only drops to about the equivalent of M1's maximum performance. 8783 vs. 7743.
It's not entirely unexpected.This is IMHO another big piece of the frustration. The M1 Air/Pro were truly revolutionary machines. They offered unparalleled performance and battery life, and they did so at a reasonable price. There was honestly nothing else like them on the market. Thus any failings they had could be excused as them being (amazingly great) first generation products.
The M2 MBA/MBP by contrast, exist in a much more well defined/developed Apple Silicon product stack. Thus any flaws are seen not as the quirks of a "first generation one of a kind product," but as a cost cutting measure to push certain people higher up the product stack.
If you relly want speed just get a Mac Book Pro!It can edit 4K video just fine. It's a more capable editing rig than most MacBook Pros before 2019.
Yeah if its her first Apple Silicon Mac thats going to be the reaction. It really is an improvement over the battery sucking space heaters Intel calls "laptop chips." Good for her, tell her to enjoy it. I remember the feeling when I first got my M1 MBA (Wow!) and then later my M1 Max MBP (OMFG!)My wife just came from a 2017 Intel 13" MacBook Pro to an M2 MacBook Air. When I got home from work today she exclaimed that she'd been using her Mac all day and it "wasn't even warm." She was so ecstatic because her old laptop would burn up doing even the trivial tasks that she uses her computer for. I expect her experience will be far more in line with the majority than the people whining about 15% decreases with multi-hour benchmarking. It's the 'Air' for a reason.
Yeah, to be honest you're totally right. I guess there are two perspectives to take on it; one where you look at it simply as a product in the 2022 laptop space with no context of Apple's other laptops (where it's an incredible machine and one of the most complete offerings on the market), and then one where you look at it specifically in the context of comparison to its predecessor (where there are areas it has taken a step back vs. its predecessor).Yeah if its her first Apple Silicon Mac thats going to be the reaction. It really is an improvement over the battery sucking space heaters Intel calls "laptop chips." Good for her, tell her to enjoy it. I remember the feeling when I first got my M1 MBA (Wow!) and then later my M1 Max MBP (OMFG!)
My issue with this thread, and the whole (counter) reaction to the negative coverage surrounding the M2 SSD/thermal throttling is, why can't people here seem to accept that the 2022 M2 MBA can simultaneously be a great machine for a lot of people (like your wife,) but that the cuts/compromises Apple made (specifically the SSD more than the to be expected thermal throttling in a fan-less design) really suck and make it a much worse machine for a lot of people for whom the 2021 M1 MBA was fine?
Because to me that's thing. It's not a bad product in the grand scheme of things, but in some ways it's noticeably worse than its predecessor (something rather uncommon in the industry.) Apple made some (well, mainly one very) disappointing, ******, and anti consumer choices and deserves to be called out on them. At the same time, the machine of course deserves praise for what it gets right. It really doesn't have to be more complicated than this.
From the videos I’ve seen, the new speakers sounded worse. Where did you see that they are better?Yeah, to be honest you're totally right. I guess there are two perspectives to take on it; one where you look at it simply as a product in the 2022 laptop space with no context of Apple's other laptops (where it's an incredible machine and one of the most complete offerings on the market), and then one where you look at it specifically in the context of comparison to its predecessor (where there are areas it has taken a step back vs. its predecessor).
It would be easier to defend some of the compromises if the price had stayed the same, since it could be written off as a way to defeat margin-eating inflation monsters without raising the price, but in this case it seems they implemented cost-cutting measures and raised the price. Not a great combo. I do still think it's a net gain over the M1 Air for its intended audience, though, when you break down the pros and cons.
Pros of M2 Air vs. M1 Air:
Cons of M2 Air vs M1 Air:
- Larger screen
- Brighter screen
- Better webcam
- Lighter weight
- Better speakers
- MagSafe
- Faster top-end CPU and GPU performance
- Shiny new design (okay, this is subjective, but I think most of the masses would take the new, fresh design)
So that's... *counts tally*... eight steps forward, two steps back. But do those two steps back really matter for the typical consumer of the Air? I'm not sure they do, and I guess that's the reason the mostly-inexplicable M2 MacBook Pro still exists.
- Significantly lower SSD performance for the base model
- Seemingly worse thermal performance under sustained loads
Anyway, I guess that's my devil's advocate argument for them. I still think it sucks that the SSD speed was halved, though again I don't think it will be noticeable to most users.
Of course it has its maximum performance limit, but whether or not it is artificially throttled before that point due to the ability of the case it is in not being able to dissipate the heat is another question.The M1 Air would throttle too at some point too right? Surely.
That’s not how Apple markets it on the official webpage.The Mac Book Air is basic device for simple web browsing and simple thing like that! It's for old and young kids and not for audio/video production! I still don't understand some of web so-called tech writers can't seem to understand that fact is making me not to trust them anymore!
From the videos I’ve seen, the new speakers sounded worse. Where did you see that they are better?
Every time I read something like this I almost choke on my coffee. Go ahead and scroll back several years with that ridiculous butterfly keyboard. It was unbelievable how many people were claiming “it’s the best keyboard I ever used!” Or, “there’s nothing wrong with it, it’s not a flaw but a design decision!” There are literally hundreds of comments to that effect whenever someone would dare question the keyboard.The throttling is not a flaw, but a very reasonable design decision and compromise.
The throttling is no different than any other fanless design, such as iPhone and iPad, the 12” MacBook (which would be an amazing machine with ASi), and the M1 Air throttles as well. The M2’s worst moment is as good or better than the M1’s best. That’s very fair for a 2nd Gen chip (again, we’re talking about fanless here). 3nm chips next to around will be significantly better.Every time I read something like this I almost choke on my coffee. Go ahead and scroll back several years with that ridiculous butterfly keyboard. It was unbelievable how many people were claiming “it’s the best keyboard I ever used!” Or, “there’s nothing wrong with it, it’s not a flaw but a design decision!” There are literally hundreds of comments to that effect whenever someone would dare question the keyboard.
Guess what - it was a flaw, and Apple is paying for it now. Now we have the throttling issue and people are just as quick to say - but even throttled it’s as fast as the M1 Air (shouldn’t it be faster - I mean that’s the whole point of a next generation chip). Or, “it’s a design decision and compromise.” Really? That’s an awfully strange design decision - especially when users have already pointed out how to inexpensively ameliorate a lot of the issue.
Rather than being so quick to justify Apple’s decisions - how about this option - maybe they blew it. They’re not flawless. They make mistakes and this could be one of them. Maybe the computer isn’t “perfect” (whatever that is), but it’s perfectly fine for you.
But really, don’t be so quick to justify or forgive something that was so easy to discover and so easy to replicate by claiming it was “a design decision”.
Max Tech have the comparison of 10 GPU vs 8 GPUI'm a little more interested in what the deal is with the 10 core GPU. According to some videos, it actually results in worse performance than the 8 core. Not just in benchmarks, but in gaming.
Now I completely understand the 'just get a pro' mentality when it comes to gaming and heavy lifting, but surely an upgraded component should be an actual upgrade!
I'm still searching for videos/articles that cover this in a non-clickbait way, but sadly that's not the internet we live in.
I decided to be brave and open four Safari tabs on my new M2 Air. I forgot that Mail was still open. I'll pour it back into the box and see if I can get a refund.
So what? If someone runs a heavy workload on an M2 it’ll still work but maybe a bit slower than a computer with a fan. The case will get a bit warm. Why does any of that matter? The M2 Air is still plenty fast enough even if it throttles.I do want to repeat one thing here:
You CANNOT expect people to not throw heavy workloads on those "entry-level" M2 MacBook Air. Most are not "educated tech-savvies" like most of us here, and all they get are the word of mouth and ads. It is always a terrible assumption to expect users to use the equipment you design for the general public unless it is extremely limited in how to use it, which this MacBook Air cannot do so.
While it is true that 15-20min sustained workload is pretty rare, it still shows that passive cooling can only go so far. It's just that the possibility of people buying this machine and using it for heavy workload (sucks Mac don't have many games available, much less than on Linux) is so low Apple doesn't really care. Otherwise, the design would've been a bit different.
One unfortunate consequence of this debacle is the narrative is more or less set, so M2 MacBook Air "reputation" (if there is one) has been damaged. I seriously doubt it will affect the sale but future buyers would expect M3 differently than they treat M2 now, especially if M3 doesn't offer 30%+ CPU performance boost over M2.