It’s such a cash grab that Apple makes you buy a new keyboard and Apple PencilYup makes sense.
It’s such a cash grab that Apple makes you buy a new keyboard and Apple PencilYup makes sense.
I would personally go with M2/16/512, which is $1279 in the Education Store. If you can wait for the Back to School promo, you will likely get a $150 gift card.Hopefully within $1700
is the m3 much better than the m2?I would personally go with M2/16/512, which is $1279 in the Education Store. If you can wait for the Back to School promo, you will likely get a $150 gift card.
As for iPad, iPad 10 should work. 256GB ($479) with USB-C Apple Pencil ($69). If you start later in the year, iPad 11 should be out.
Total = $1279 + $479 + $69 - $150 = $1677.
Certified Refurbished iPad Air 4 ($469) is also a viable alternative. It has a slightly better screen but the camera placement is in portrait, rather than landscape. With the iPad Air, you can also pay an additional $40 to upgrade to the Apple Pencil 2 ($109 refurbished), which has wireless charging and pressure sensitivity. The total would be $1707.
You could also shop at other places for better deals.
I honestly don't think you can tell the difference in your usage.is the m3 much better than the m2?
gotcha, im probably gonna go with the mac air because i do like the pros screen but its also much heavier and builkier and less portableI honestly don't think you can tell the difference in your usage.
Another thing to take note of is that the M2 MBA only supports 1 external monitor, whereas the M3 MBA supports 2.
The iPad won't get macOS because Apple is not going to make the same mistake Microsoft made:I just hope the iPad gets Mac OS or something similar but they probably won’t bc Apple will lose billions
gotcha, so for college is it suppsoed to be a primayr device or more of a secondary device to a macbook?The iPad won't get macOS because Apple is not going to make the same mistake Microsoft made:
Trying to shoehorn a keyboard and mouse OS on a device meant for a very, VERY fat fingertip.
Even docked on the MK, the device would have to ASK if you want to use macOS, since macOS and iPadOS are VERY different even if they share design elements.
Folks have a hard time accepting that many (perhaps most?) iPad users DON'T WANT macOS. If they want a Mac they'd get one.
The iPad is its own thing, and us iPad fans like that about it.
You have several questions to answer:I just got off the phone will Apple and the person recommended the iPad Pro bc I can take physical notes and type but he also said iPad is is very limited so I’m even more confused
The iPad is INTENDED as a secondary device for Mac users, and primary for everyone else.gotcha, so for college is it suppsoed to be a primayr device or more of a secondary device to a macbook?
Just consider this specific example: iPad has a limited version of Safari compared to the Mac version, and iPad cannot run alternative web browsers. Let's say you get a course assignment that only supports Firefox or Chrome. What would you do?gotcha, so for college is it suppsoed to be a primayr device or more of a secondary device to a macbook?
While I agree with your point, your example is flawed as the iPad can be set up to use the desktop version of Safari, as well as run Chrome and Firefox.Just consider this specific example: iPad has a limited version of Safari compared to the Mac version, and iPad cannot run alternative web browsers. Let's say you get a course assignment that only supports Firefox or Chrome. What would you do?
In this way, when you are going into a world of unknown needs that could be specific, you should not make your primary device something that cannot meet certain needs.
Chrome and Firefox on iOS/iPadOS are just Safari with different skins. They're all still WebKit-based. Unless you're in the EU (soon).While I agree with your point, your example is flawed as the iPad can be set up to use the desktop version of Safari, as well as run Chrome and Firefox.
Still, there are certain iPad limitations that can be easily avoided by just using a Mac.
Just consider this specific example: iPad has a limited version of Safari compared to the Mac version, and iPad cannot run alternative web browsers. Let's say you get a course assignment that only supports Firefox or Chrome. What would you do?
In this way, when you are going into a world of unknown needs that could be specific, you should not make your primary device something that cannot meet certain needs.
Is that good or bad?Chrome and Firefox on iOS/iPadOS are just Safari with different skins. They're all still WebKit-based. Unless you're in the EU (soon).
iPad cannot run alternative web browsers. Let's say you get a course assignment that only supports Firefox or Chrome. What would you do?
Chrome and Firefox on iOS/iPadOS are just Safari with different skins. They're all still WebKit-based. Unless you're in the EU (soon).
I run Chrome all the time on my iPad. Firefox works as well.
i am running a 2011 MacBook pro. will my mind be blown as well??Then the MBA M2 will blow your mind.
Right, but they are all webkit at their core. I use Firefox to sync my activity with my other devices, but for iOS and iPadOS, it is basically a Safari cake with Firefox frosting.I run Chrome all the time on my iPad. Firefox works as well.
whats a webkit?Right, but they are all webkit at their core. I use Firefox to sync my activity with my other devices, but for iOS and iPadOS, it is basically a Safari cake with Firefox frosting.
It's the underlying architecture of Safari.whats a webkit?
While I agree with your point, your example is flawed as the iPad can be set up to use the desktop version of Safari, as well as run Chrome and Firefox.
Still, there are certain iPad limitations that can be easily avoided by just using a Mac.
I run Chrome all the time on my iPad. Firefox works as well.
All browsers run on an "engine" which is what they use to display web pages. On a computer, each browser has a different engine. Safari uses WebKit, Chrome uses Blink, and Firefox uses Gecko.whats a webkit?
Gotcha, I’m probably gonna get a cheaper iPad to go along with the Mac air. Also is the MacBook Pro m3 pro much better than the m3 air with 16gb and 512ssd?All browsers run on an "engine" which is what they use to display web pages. On a computer, each browser has a different engine. Safari uses WebKit, Chrome uses Blink, and Firefox uses Gecko.
iPads on the other hand are very locked down. They do not allow other browser engines to run. So even though you can run "Chrome" or "Firefox" on an iPhone or iPad, all that really is is Safari/WebKit, with a different coat of paint on it. It's always surprising to me how many people, even those who are into tech and peruse forums like this, are deceived about this.
What this means in practice is that on an iPad, if Safari can't display a webpage properly, there's no alternative and you're SOL. Because "Chrome" and "Firefox" and all the different iOS browsers are really just re-skinned Safari.
Many education systems are now web-based and there are some that will not be optimized, or designed at all, for Safari. It's needless to risk running into that limitation that a Mac would not have. And that's just one example of the iPad's inflexibility being a problem, there are certainly others too. Your primary system, especially when it is work or school dependent, should be as flexible as possible IMO.
You would not notice a difference between the Air and the Pro from a performance standpoint. They would both seem equally fast to you.Gotcha, I’m probably gonna get a cheaper iPad to go along with the Mac air. Also is the MacBook Pro m3 pro much better than the m3 air with 16gb and 512ssd?
yep, i held is and its decently heavier and bulkier but the display is nicer, ik I wouldnt notice much of a difference but is the $300 extra worth it for the m3 pro?You would not notice a difference between the Air and the Pro from a performance standpoint. They would both seem equally fast to you.
The Pro has some nicer things like the display and speakers. But it is bigger, thicker, and heavier. So it’s a trade off.
That’s really up to you. You know the pros and cons, at some point ya just gotta make a choiceyep, i held is and its decently heavier and bulkier but the display is nicer, ik I wouldnt notice much of a difference but is the $300 extra worth it for the m3 pro?