Compared to the M2 version is meant here I think.According to The Verge, the M4 iPad Pro scored 50 percent higher than the M3 version in benchmark tests, but while it feels faster, it doesn't feel 50 percent faster.
This is a contradiction. The simpler explanation is that people like the iPad as is.Why change a terrible product if it sells good.
That doesn't sum it up at all. How do they know that the M4 has incredible performance when there is allegedly no software to demonstrate it?🤣 Yeah, that pretty much sums it up quite nicely.
Powerful hardware hobbled by its software.
I'm interested to hear your thoughts as to why you think so.Calling iJustine a “reviewer “ is laughable 🤣🤣
+1As someone who's not a boomer pining for a desktop OS on a tablet, this revision sounds amazing and I can't wait for mine.
She's an Apple ad machine. She legit can't even say one criticism of any Apple item. I stopped watching her videos for a while now. I tried to watch her iPad video but changed it once she said you can connect the iPad to a monitor and use stage manager. She basically described what is already possible on the previous version.Calling iJustine a “reviewer “ is laughable 🤣🤣
…hampered by software
Sorry, but you could argue that performance is also hampered by the footprint of the device. The thermal ceiling of the iPad would limit sustained performance regardless what OS is running on it. It’s almost like Apple optimized the OS for the type of device it would be running on or something?
Unfortunately Apple doesn’t currently have the luxury of designing an optimized SoC for every device they make, so until then we have to put up with stupid statements like, “CpU tOo pOwErFuL - Os nO gOoD!” Never mind the benefits of all the other parts of the SoC the OS can make use of and of course its overall efficiency.
Nah, they’re writing from the perspective of a Mac user (someone that doesn’t know “Notes” exists) that has to pay their bills.I read the article and I think the author is writing from just one perspective of an iPad user. First let me get out of the way my puzzlement with the outcry because the iPad doesn't have a native calculator app. Really?? And I found the complaints about the productivity apps (Pages and Numbers) off base for me. I can see where wham-bam power users would feel shorted but for my class of users, who just want to do Safari and Mail and play some games, the iPad is much preferred over a laptop. I'm looking forward to a prettier screen, much faster CPU (A17 to M4) and more space (256G to 512G) for movies.
It’s a terrible product and terrible people like it, so it sells terribly well.This is a contradiction. The simpler explanation is that people like the iPad as is.
I can't really think of any major features iPad OS misses that normal users actually need for it to be a good OS.
What are people missing exactly?
I suppose your use case is rather limited compared to what most power users require.
![]()
Not an iPad Pro Review: Why iPadOS Still Doesn’t Get the Basics Right
Let me cut to the chase: sadly, I don’t have a new iPad Pro to review today on MacStories. I was able to try one in London last week, and, as I wrote, I came away impressed with the hardware. However, I didn’t get a chance to use a new iPad Pro over the pastwww.macstories.net
I suppose your use case is rather limited compared to what most power users require.
![]()
Not an iPad Pro Review: Why iPadOS Still Doesn’t Get the Basics Right
Let me cut to the chase: sadly, I don’t have a new iPad Pro to review today on MacStories. I was able to try one in London last week, and, as I wrote, I came away impressed with the hardware. However, I didn’t get a chance to use a new iPad Pro over the pastwww.macstories.net
Slightly off topic:
Does the new iPad 11” M4 fit in the old Apple folio case?
Unlike us, you mean?I always put reviewers and YouTube benchmarked ads on the low tier of who to trust. I put the real users on the top tier of who trust. The real users are out there showing their skills instead of making noises on forums.
Come talk to us when you see a 120-165hz screen for the first time. No, it doesn't make a difference when watching 24fps content. But it makes a massive difference everywhere else.Aside from the over-exaggerated motion brought to us by the likes of Samsung and Panasonic, that anyone would need a refresh rate greater than 60Hz, or find it difficult to look at, is hard to believe.
Unlike us, you mean?