The fact is I am right, as it makes no difference whatsoever with real life performance.
I've been using it since the original 1984 Macintosh.
Benchmarks only matter in showing performance deltas, but real life performance are not accurately reflected in benchmarks whatsoever.
You're more of the troll by grabbing an article that is totally invalid.
It is you who should do your homework. That article you posted assumes that the i5 doesn't have hyper threading, when in actual fact, Apple does use i5s with HT.
Lol, sure I'm trolling my own thread by posting an article that doesn't live up to your high and mighty standards? Don't make me laugh. Not to mention the fact that digital trends is a reputable site.
Your OWN article proves it! Did you not read anything I wrote? Answer me this, why does it matter to you so much that I spent an extra 160 quid to get a better, faster process that has 1MB more cache?
And saying it makes no real-life difference is just wrong. It may not make a big difference as I've said all along, but it makes a difference. And that small difference can add up depending on what tasks are being carried out.
Last edited: