wow if you're so paranoid, why get a Mac mini in the first place?
And about Intel vs PPC: With current software optimization Intels are roughly 2x as fast on the same clock speed and number of cores, while running A LOT cooler. I can't think of a certain advantage of PPC that would compensate for this.
Paranoid? it's technical ...not emotional. Good price on a great little computer. Got a friend with a mini, and I look askance at it thinking about the heat inside..and that little vent on the back. "Let me crunch your video files" I tell her. I have another friend who is using Pro Tools on an iMac (Intel) She calls me up: 'My computer is giving me overheating warnings" me: "This is why I suggested getting a MacPro instead of the iMac, it's not meant for sustained heavy processing like that." But she liked the idea that the whole thing was in the screen....
Re PPC...assuming that the clock speed is comparable to current Intel speeds, and guessing that maybe someone is developing PPC multicore chips and looking at real world performance versus statistical testing, given those pretexts, are there any other variables that could make a compelling reason to have a PPC product line in addition. I read an argument somewhere that went something along the lines of: "if an Intel Mac goes 'dead', you will have a harder time restarting it than you would with a PPC mac because the PPC startup instruction software (or something) is in 'it's own chip' (which by allusion I take to mean is not the case with the Intels)" ..so I was wondering about the validity of this point of view, whether it is an actual fact-ish or does really point to some larger issue. I was paraphrasing the point, I would repeat the exact quote if I could find it again. Hopefully to hear from persons with real world experience with both types of computers, not just repeating test results. I am all for the Intel chips, would get one if it gets to a point where I need to replace the machines I'm using. But...if a PPC line was made, I probably would get one of those instead...so I don't have to get a whole lot of new software, older favorites..lots of it; bows to Rosetta regardless. Are there any valid 'issues' with Intel (beyond personal preferences) that using PPC CPU's would address?