Does any other Apple Mac ever have USB 3.2 2X2? I did not think so. I was under the impression Most Apple USB-C, that weren’t Thunderbolt, were USB 3.1USB 3.2 2X2
Does any other Apple Mac ever have USB 3.2 2X2? I did not think so. I was under the impression Most Apple USB-C, that weren’t Thunderbolt, were USB 3.1USB 3.2 2X2
Apple can pack more of them into a single shipping container.What is the use-case for a smaller Mini? A pocket Mac?
MacInsiderPro posted a leaked new groundbreaking rendering of the new M4 Mini
View attachment 2432437View attachment 2432447
I totally agree. Honestly, I would’ve preferred a thinner design (given how much free space there is in the M1 model already), while this render looks like a compressed Mac Studio (whose design I truly don’t like).My question here is why does the Mac Mini have to be smaller? It's a desktop machine. I'd rather it stay the current size and maintain better thermal performance and also not have all the cables plugged into it crowded together in a huge mess that ends up dragging the machine around.
I doubt that..Sounds like this mini will be more powerful and smaller than my M1 Mac Studio!
Are people really excited that the Mac mini being redisgned to be smaller will inevitably mean the continuation of Tim Cook's corporate greed-based anti-consumer decision to prevent the entire Macintosh line from having upgradable memory and hard drives?
Sale, marketing and PR people, who write the advertising copy. They Cannot wait to use the tag line, “Smallest Mac, ever”.Genuine question. Does anyone actually want the Mac mini to be smaller? Who would take smaller over more ports, or heaven forfend some user servicable parts.
Yeah all of the recent Macs have been a disaster, LOL.
Oh wait, no, they are the best Macs Apple has ever shipped. Whoops.
Either way, I’m keeping my M1 Mac Studio. It’s given me no reason to doubt its performance. I most likely will be using it long after they stop issuing os updates. It’s been that good to me.I doubt that..
Love it!I wish Apple would completely rethink the Mac mini and make it stackable.
Over time, you get a more and more powerful computer, not by replacing, but upgrading incrementally.
- 2024 - Buy your first Mac mini.
- 2025 - Buy the next Mac mini, not to replace your original, but to supplement it. Just stack on top and plug it in with a single cable for all power and communications. It becomes part of the "mesh".
- 2026 - Repeat.
That's the opportunity that Apple has here.
What is the use-case for a smaller Mini? A pocket Mac?
There are SO MANY other applications that a smaller form factor Mac Mini could be used for. I have personally used it back on 2012 as on on board multi media info/entertainment system for two autobiles. A little clunky, a little learning curve but after some tinkering and more tinkering and some software that was clutch then, It was an amazing concept. I'm sure that I am not the only one to have conceived the idea... And if I am, I just F**KED up, I've said too much.🤣 😂 EVERY and ANYONE was impressed. So while you are correct, "it's a desktop machine" think outside box Padwan learner.My question here is why does the Mac Mini have to be smaller? It's a desktop machine. I'd rather it stay the current size and maintain better thermal performance and also not have all the cables plugged into it crowded together in a huge mess that ends up dragging the machine around.
I'd think a raspberry pi is better suited to such applications.There are SO MANY other applications that a smaller form factor Mac Mini could be used for. I have personally used it back on 2012 as on on board multi media info/entertainment system for two autobiles. A little clunky, a little learning curve but after some tinkering and more tinkering and some software that was clutch then, It was an amazing concept. I'm sure that I am not the only one to have conceived the idea... And if I am, I just F**KED up, I've said too much.🤣 😂 EVERY and ANYONE was impressed. So while you are correct, "it's a desktop machine" think outside box Padwan learner.
Because if it didn't change there would be an equal amount of complaining about how it didn't change and how Apple is no longer capable of innovation.My question here is why does the Mac Mini have to be smaller? It's a desktop machine. I'd rather it stay the current size and maintain better thermal performance and also not have all the cables plugged into it crowded together in a huge mess that ends up dragging the machine around.
We could have a Beowulf Cluster of MinisI wish Apple would completely rethink the Mac mini and make it stackable.
Over time, you get a more and more powerful computer, not by replacing, but upgrading incrementally.
- 2024 - Buy your first Mac mini.
- 2025 - Buy the next Mac mini, not to replace your original, but to supplement it. Just stack on top and plug it in with a single cable for all power and communications. It becomes part of the "mesh".
- 2026 - Repeat.
That's the opportunity that Apple has here.
The sky is the limit!I wish Apple would completely rethink the Mac mini and make it stackable.
Over time, you get a more and more powerful computer, not by replacing, but upgrading incrementally.
- 2024 - Buy your first Mac mini.
- 2025 - Buy the next Mac mini, not to replace your original, but to supplement it. Just stack on top and plug it in with a single cable for all power and communications. It becomes part of the "mesh".
- 2026 - Repeat.
That's the opportunity that Apple has here.