damn, that wouldve been too good to be true!Correction. No, it's not fixed. But it seems to wait quite a bit longer before the fans kick in.
damn, that wouldve been too good to be true!Correction. No, it's not fixed. But it seems to wait quite a bit longer before the fans kick in.
but I understand SoftRAID won't work in Big Sur?No issues with my 4TB Accelsior whatsoever. No issues with anything actually. Install was uneventful.
but I understand Softraid won't work in Big Sur? Are there alternatives to Softraid that will work??No issues with my 4TB Accelsior whatsoever. No issues with anything actually. Install was uneventful.
but I understand SoftRAID won't work in Big Sur?
Is there an alternative to softraid that will work with the Accelsior that you can Recommend? Thanks!SoftRAID - Compatibility Notes
Check the latest updates and compatibility with SoftRAID and major OS releases.www.softraid.com
You would need SoftRaid6, which has been delayed for at least 2 years (maybe 3+). Stopped using or recommending their products completely.
I’m using softraid on an Accelsior. I work as a video editor and understand that raid 4 is the best for my needs as it provides the best mix of speed and redundancy. But I’m by no means and export and would welcome any input.Why don't you use Apple's own RAID? What kind of RAID are you using anyway?
I'm a video editor, but our workflow and needs might be different. If I were to use another RAID than what I'm using now, I would use 10, then RAID 5 (over RAID 4). They are technically the same except the way they stripe the drives. RAID 5 will give you more speed advantage which is what you might be looking for in your work.I’m using softraid on an Accelsior. I work as a video editor and understand that raid 4 is the best for my needs as it provides the best mix of speed and redundancy. But I’m by no means and export and would welcome any input.
Is there an alternative to softraid that will work with the Accelsior that you can Recommend? Thanks!
I find this difficult to believe & have worked with OWC on beta testing etc. In any case: 1) write to OWC for a SoftRAID 6 beta and/or download from http://www.softraid.com/sr_beta. As far as I can tell, this is functioning perfectly well on Big Sur 11.01 and looks exactly the same as v5.xx on Catalina; drivers install install as they should. 2) I also use SoftRAID lite on Windows and this reads & writes (HFS+) RAID 0 & 1 cross-platform. Soon a 'full' SoftRAID (RAID 4, 5 etc) will be released for Windows and I suspect this will coincide with the SoftRAID 6 release for both windows & macos.SoftRAID - Compatibility Notes
Check the latest updates and compatibility with SoftRAID and major OS releases.www.softraid.com
You would need SoftRaid6, which has been delayed for at least 2 years (maybe 3+). Stopped using or recommending their products completely.
Really good advice, thank you for taking the time.I'm a video editor, but our workflow and needs might be different. If I were to use another RAID than what I'm using now, I would use 10, then RAID 5 (over RAID 4). They are technically the same except the way they stripe the drives. RAID 5 will give you more speed advantage which is what you might be looking for in your work.
As for myself, I'm similarly using a PCIe card - Sonnet m.2 4x4. I've paired that with 4 x 2TB sticks. What I did is do a RAID 0 x 2 (i.e. 2 x 2TB in RAID 0 + 2 x 2TB in RAID 0). That gives me 4TB to work on my video files. The other 4TB is my mirror drive which is automatically copied every night on a schedule via Carbon Copy Cloner.
This is acting like RAID 10 (or 1+0), but without instantaneous redundancy. There is obviously a risk to have these drives not copied at once, but also advantages which in my case I'd rather deal with which I'll explain below.
As a video editor, I'm constantly accessing (large) files - reading and writing - as I create versions and more revisions. And you have to remember SSDs have a finite write amount. When that happens, they are done. I'm delaying the decay of my mirror RAID by only writing a few times, versus constantly on my main RAID.
In your case, you have the safety of 1 drive failing but you're also constantly writing on all SSDs so the chances of these failing at the same time due to write amount having reached will be greater.
Granted this may not be reached by a regular person over the life of their computer. But in video editing with project after project in files at least 4K and above - we're pushing these to their limits faster than regular.
Again, I don't know how large of a file you're dealing, how much you edit daily, how much space you need, and how fast you need to access. So take this as another person's perspective.
I'm sorry I can't let this slip… why are you using RAID 4? It's somewhat exotic, offers you no benefit over RAID 5 (RAID 5 spreads the parity over each disk). RAID 4 requires a dedicated parity disk, so your whole array is limited by the speed of the parity disk. RAID 4 should only be used if your dedicated parity disk is much faster than your striping drives. Because the Accelsior offers 4 identical drives in the array, it isn't useful here.I’m using softraid on an Accelsior. I work as a video editor and understand that raid 4 is the best for my needs as it provides the best mix of speed and redundancy. But I’m by no means and export and would welcome any input.
Wow ~Improvements from what task? This will only matter if you’re pushing the limits like rendering. In which case you can monitor your GPU workload and see the difference in core utilization. One might show 90% utilization while the other will show 20%.