T toke lahti macrumors 68040 Apr 23, 2007 3,299 516 Helsinki, Finland Nov 24, 2016 #26 So, was the discussion few years ago about suitable ssd's for macs only about trim?
T toke lahti macrumors 68040 Apr 23, 2007 3,299 516 Helsinki, Finland Nov 24, 2016 #27 FYI, I bought Kingston V300 60gb 2 years ago, and its controller couldn't handshake 3gb connection with my mbp's amd chipset. They tried to fix the ssd in UK, but eventually sent me 120gb version that worked.
FYI, I bought Kingston V300 60gb 2 years ago, and its controller couldn't handshake 3gb connection with my mbp's amd chipset. They tried to fix the ssd in UK, but eventually sent me 120gb version that worked.
ponchorage macrumors newbie Nov 17, 2016 7 1 Dec 1, 2016 #28 sevichenko said: this is faster than a SATAIII, right? Click to expand... No, it is SATA III, which maxes out at 600 MB/s.
sevichenko said: this is faster than a SATAIII, right? Click to expand... No, it is SATA III, which maxes out at 600 MB/s.
T toke lahti macrumors 68040 Apr 23, 2007 3,299 516 Helsinki, Finland Dec 2, 2016 #29 Just wonderin' who and how often needs faster speeds than sata2? Running OS from ssd is 10x faster than from hdd even with sata1.
Just wonderin' who and how often needs faster speeds than sata2? Running OS from ssd is 10x faster than from hdd even with sata1.