Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Thanks so much guys! This has just been unbelievably helpful. I know where to get RAM and how much to get. I have a solid idea and increased understanding of how to set up my drives, and I'm convinced that I can get a couple of new processors and install them, saving a ton of cash.

We're down to one question!

Is it ultimately worth the extra $70 for the W3680 (3.33GHz, 6-Core) from the X5677 (3.4GHz, 4-Core), or the extra $145 for the W3690 (3.46GHz 6-Core)?

That's the last decision to make!

Again, it comes down to the question how many cores does Photoshop use, vs. how much do you want to spend. Photoshop is indeed multi-core aware. I recommended the X5677 strictly for budget reasons. I use 'em, but then again I've got a dual CPU Machine. If you want a six core CPU and are willing to spend the bucks, the yes a W3680 or an X5680 (3.33GHz) or a W3690 or X5690 (3.46GHz). In a single CPU system both the 3 series or the 5 series will work. The 5 series has the advantage of being able to handle more RAM. 56GB with the 3 series and 64GB with the 5 series. But as discussed earlier, that generation of CPUs has 3 channel memory, so maybe the total memory question is moot. Other wise performance will be same for CPUs with equal GHz speed.

Lou
 
Perfect Lou. Given that we're using After Effects / Premiere Pro, I think those extra cores will pull their weight. The weird thing is that it seems the W3690 and the X5690 are the exact same processor...same performance...same benchmarks...etc. I hope I'm not missing something.

Thanks again!
 
^^^^No they are not. The W3690 has one I/O bus and is designed for single CPU operation only. The X5690 has a two X I/O bus, and is designed for dual CPU operation, but as has been said the X5690 will work just fine in a single CPU setup, and will handle more ultimate RAM.

Lou
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.