Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

technocoy

macrumors 6502a
Sep 4, 2002
766
0
Raleigh, NC
I've used Seagate and Western Digital with good results all around. I tend to lean towards the seagates and the noise is nearly imperceptible on an internal installation.

Toshiba and Hitachi I have always had decent performance from as well.

Stay away from maxtor. I have had SEVERAL fail out of maybe a dozen drives.

Good luck!
 

Lanbrown

macrumors 6502a
Mar 20, 2003
893
0
SATA 1.0 has a maximum theoretical transfer limit of 1.5GB/s

SATA 2.5 has a maximum theoretical transfer limit of 3.0GB/s

If you run an SATA 2.5 drive on a SATA 1.0 chipset, limiting the transfer speed eliminates the potential for data loss and system instability. (Think of it like trying to force 30 liters per second through a hose that can only handle 15 liters per second.)

This is not correct at all. If the drive communicates at 3Gb/s and the interface on the computer is 1.5Gb/s, it won’t understand the data being sent to it at all. The drive and computer won’t even be able to synchronize, so no data will ever be transferred.
 

dkoralek

macrumors 6502
Sep 12, 2006
268
0
Wow, that's some bass ackwards logic. If the drives are more prone to failure, wouldn't extending the free service and replacement cost a company more money? Conversely, if a manufacturer knows that its product has a limited lifespan, wouldn't it be in their interest for the "standard" warranty to end before that average lifespan is up?

BTW, car warranties and electronics warranties are apples and oranges -- American Honda's factory warranties vary from 3/36k to 5/60k, depending on model, and can be extended to 10/100k for a fee. The reason for the short warranty is that a long warranty does no bolster Honda's image, and given the extremely long life-cycles of their cars (versus the industry average), a long warranty only promotes private owner sales of existing vehicles, rather than new vehicle sales. Hyundai, which actually has relatively decent initial quality and product lifespans (better than Ford and Mazda, IIRC), is trying to establish a presence and positive reputation in the U.S. market, so the longer warranties encourage initial and subsequent owners to keep their Hyundai's on the road for a longer period, potentially enhancing brand awareness.

It's rare that a computer carry a hood ornament, even moreso that the hood ornament feature the hard drive's logo. WD's carry a short warranty because they're cheap. Seagate's carry a longer warranty because they're not.

Nope, the usual rationale for extending a warranty is because you need to give the assurance that if the product fails that it will be replaced/fixed in order to sell the product. Hyundai has a cheap reputation (while quality is getting better, it still doesn't match the top quality manufacturers; and saying that it is better than mazda and ford isn't exactly a complement; you'd hope that you could outdo them unless you are gm, maybe). Honda doesn't need to have a longer warranty to sell their cars, because the cars are reliable. And you are correct, that they don't need to bolster their image. But all things equal, car manufacturers with lousy reputations, need to extend their warranties to sell their cars (or sell them so cheap...). The exceptions in the quality department are probably companies like VW which have lousy reliability, but good reputations.
Since you can get extended warranties on computer products, either through manufacturers or through stores for a fee, the comparison is apt.

The reason that Seagate probably has extended there warranty vs. WD is actually a different beast altogether, because people feel the need to justify spending more on a Seagate (so, you're right in that sense). Even if the drive fails more than a WD (not saying it does), the cost over the WD is far more than the costs to replace the few that fail in the extra time period. But what I was mainly driving at is that a longer warranty does not imply a more reliable product.

cheers.
 

dr01dy

macrumors member
May 3, 2007
68
2
I've used Seagate and Western Digital with good results all around. I tend to lean towards the seagates and the noise is nearly imperceptible on an internal installation.

Toshiba and Hitachi I have always had decent performance from as well.

Stay away from maxtor. I have had SEVERAL fail out of maybe a dozen drives.

Good luck!


I buy seagates for the 5 year warranty !
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.