MR says "the M3 Max shows an approximately 18% increase in single-core performance compared to the M2 Max. In multi-core performance, the improvement is even more pronounced, with the M3 Max scoring about 38% higher than the M2 Max" and "M3 Max shows an increase of approximately 14% in GPU benchmarks" "a compelling upgrade."
Personally I primarily look at GPU and single core, and I do not call 14% & 18% a significant leap, I call it normal good evolution. IMO the bigger observation is that Max chips own the issue of performance; Pro and Basic chips are weaker regardless of generation.
Really? Here are some screenshots from Geekbench of the M2 Ultra Mac Studio (not the Max) and the 16" M3 Max MacBook Pro.
The 16" M3 Max MacBook Pro beats the M2 Ultra Mac Studio in Single core easily while being able to match the M2 Ultra in multi core performance.
Calling the M3 Max not a significant leap in performance over the M2 Max is joke, when the M3 Max is basically beating the M2 Ultra.
Really, stop spreading BS information. The 16" M3 Max MacBook Pro destroys the M2 Max Mac Studio, it is not even close.
Last edited: