Isn't this what Steve said word for word?
I can't believe that the size difference between a MBA and a MB are big enough to matter to most folks.
I wouldn't be surprised as my statement makes perfect sense
BTW, the size and weight difference between an MBA and MB is significant. Remember that
UGH! feeling you experience when you think about 8 pound, 1.5" thick Dells versus your lighter, slimmer MBP? Same thing here
shorter version: if performance matters, it's a toy.
LOL. I would put money on the 1.8/SSD config being as fast as (or faster than) current SR MBPs in many, if not most, important tasks.
And about the MBA being the "slowest Mac on sale today," I'm going to repost a previous comment:
OK.
The Sony TZ is the slowest computer Sony makes.
The Toshiba R500 is the slowest computer Toshiba makes.
The Lenovo X300 is the slowest computer Lenovo makes.
And on and on and on. Note that none of the above models are in any way value priced, either. No "crazy justifications;" that is simply the nature of the beast!