US based forum for a US based company.Pardon! I contribute to the running of an international forum as such the givaways should be just that!
The Rolling Stones sang a song about this...
US based forum for a US based company.Pardon! I contribute to the running of an international forum as such the givaways should be just that!
Alternatively, why kowtow to a small but vocal minority who have unreasonable expectations? By their logic, the BBC should be shut down because it is not available in the US.
A.
I would almost thing that giving away to just a few more than one country would bring up even more questions in the sense of since you can obviously give away to more than just your local country then why can't you give away to this other one that isn't part of the few or just to everyone? It's almost as if it's either everyone or no one, with just a single one being the least questionable alternative to those extremes.not really the same thing though is it. more like you paid your bbc license fee of 140 quid a year (after all us europeans get all the same annoying adds on this site here) but you didnt get to take part in the competitions. and you wouldn't be arguing to get rid of the bbc, just their competitions....
see im in portugal, i know we are restrictive on these sorts of things, unlike the uk. it wouldn't take more than an hour of one member of forum staff's time to check the rules in say the top 20 countries in their usage stats.
if you can't include us, that vocal minority called "the rest of the world" or at least a fair amount like macnn.com then personally id bin the competitions.
if you dont want to bin them can't you create a european login page where we dont even see the giveaways. maybe you could also have that page have less adverts so we give less and we get less?
i have another idea, and i know this is going to go down badly with that vocal majority called 'one country west of here' but how about you occasionally say to a few european companies to give giveaways specifically for a few uk countries with the rules of the giveaway tied to that. I'm sure those european companies will themselves have run giveaways before and will have a handle on what the rules are.
I would almost thing that giving away to just a few more than one country would bring up even more questions in the sense of since you can obviously give away to more than just your local country then why can't you give away to this other one that isn't part of the few or just to everyone? It's almost as if it's either everyone or no one, with just a single one being the least questionable alternative to those extremes.
Well, what I was saying there is that if based on rules they allowed a few more in addition to US to make it a total of 6, for example, then those outside of those 6 would easily question why is it that 6 were able to get in and not some others in addition to it, since clearly by letting in more than 1 it already shows that the ability to let in another country and thus can be seen as opening the window of letting in any other country. That's why I was saying that outside of extremes of allowing all or none the next one that would be the simplest to explain would be just allowing one and basically saying that's where we operate and can do it but can't do it outside of that. It doesn't mean that the site isn't interested in others or anything like that, just that this is what's reasonable for them and what they are going with. Reading more into it is basically reading into something that isn't there.you've lost me, surely you mean MOST questionable alternative.
see other sights only ban the countries that are a problem, and they dont upset anyone. so surely thats the best solution. the complaints would be far less and there would be a legitimate answer. and people from different parts of the world would win prizes. i suggested 20 countries, guessing that prob 15 at least of them would have no problem with a computer site giving away a free piece of software in a raffle. the site also wouldn't be seen to be only interested in american posters. so relatively all good.
the second option, if you stopped giving away things then people would forget there ever was prizes, and no one would be happy about winning and no one would be pissed off at the slight. since more people get pissed off than win anything, its still a winner.
so logically, the status quo is the one that causes the most negativity.
Well, what I was saying there is that if based on rules they allowed a few more in addition to US to make it a total of 6, for example, then those outside of those 6 would easily question why is it that 6 were able to get in and not some others in addition to it, since clearly by letting in more than 1 it already shows that the ability to let in another country and thus can be seen as opening the window of letting in any other country. That's why I was saying that outside of extremes of allowing all or none the next one that would be the simplest to explain would be just allowing one and basically saying that's where we operate and can do it but can't do it outside of that. It doesn't mean that the site isn't interested in others or anything like that, just that this is what's reasonable for them and what they are going with. Reading more into it is basically reading into something that isn't there.
As for stopping the giveaways, sure that seems like it would appease those who can't participate at the cost of all of those who can--thus the earlier comment along the lines of "if I can't have it then no one should".
Let's keep it USA only baby.
Just curious, are you not getting the use and befits of the site itself? Seems like ads and all that are related to the site and its functionality and services, and something like giveaways are just small bonuses for fun that are basically beyond that.Fine with me, just make sure add revenue generated from my viewing are credited to my account...
Just curious, are you not getting the use and befits of the site itself? Seems like ads and all that are related to the site and its functionality and services, and something like giveaways are just small bonuses for fun that are basically beyond that.
MacRumors doesn't owe you anything.Fine with me, just make sure add revenue generated from my viewing are credited to my account...
Either way most people who are on MR are US based.
MacRumors doesn't owe you anything.
Either way most people who are on MR are US based.
Speaking as a regular member, not as staff...
I'm not sure why a US-based site (MacRumors) needs to comply with, say, NZ law in the first place. The site is hosted and run from outside NZ so surely NZ law doesn't apply.
Although NZ may be a bit of a special case since NZ Post has services that are explicitly designed to let you get "US only" deliveries in NZ...
Most people in the USA do not think there is a world outside the USA except for Iran, Iraq, North Korea and other "evil" countries....
So USA only basically means the whole world including the moon to MR....
I just want to chime to say that your concerns are not falling on deaf ears. We're well aware of the issue, and it's a major concern for us too. There isn't an easy solution, but we're still working on some possible ways to include more of our readers.
It was deleted because it was off topic to the thread it was being posted in. This is the place to discuss it and the content of your post made it clear you already knew that.I guess they don't even bother moving posts anymore, they just delete them instead... Probably didn't help the post had multiple likes.
It was deleted because it was off topic to the thread it was being posted in. This is the place to discuss it and the content of your post made it clear you already knew that.
Posts in the giveaway threads complaining about the restrictions just derail the threads and won't achieve much because they are likely to go unnoticed by the people who can actually do anything about it. This forum is closely monitored by the staff and a thread with 100+ posts which is getting regular new posts will definitely grab their attention.Was it really off topic? It was about something written in the giveaway article so that would be on topic. I'm not after you Olly, it's just MR management seems to just not care one way or the other unless it has an impact on their advertisers. Nobody likes to see negative comments on their front page so lets delete/ move out of sight instead of dealing with the issue at hand...
And yes we've all seen the token comment(s) from MR that they are looking at this but it's such a complicated endeavour for them.
Posts in the giveaway threads complaining about the restrictions just derail the threads and won't achieve much because they are likely to go unnoticed by the people who can actually do anything about it. This forum is closely monitored by the staff and a thread with 100+ posts which is getting regular new posts will definitely grab their attention.
As to your disparaging remarks aimed at the staff, believe me if they say they are looking into it then they are looking into it. This place means a lot to them and I'm sure they are trying their best to provide a solution which will make as many of our members happy as possible. Positive suggestions as to how we can get around the current restrictions are more than welcome but slagging them off without knowing all the facts is not very helpful.