I agree. The cheapest Vaio Z goes for $2,449.99, which is a whole lot more than the $1,799 Apple charges for a top of the line MBA. Admittedly, the Zs have better specs than the MBA has but they will only run Windows unless they are hacked.
The money issue isn't really a factor in my opinion. I would PREFER Apple sell much more pricey MBAs. There should be MBAs in the price range that Sony is competing in with the Z. The problem is Apple is missing a market here by pricing the MBAs so cheaply. Apple is missing out on luxury now, and I believe it's because Apple didn't have the iPad before. If Apple is smart about it, I believe the next MBA should be priced higher with incredible specs available.
I think they should reintroduce BTO and the MBA. Sure the MBA could start at $1499, but they should have BTO options allowing people to spend stupid amounts on their MBAs. I would pay for BTO options like, IPS display, LCD/IPS trackpad, aluminum capped keys, anodized aluminum, higher range CPU, discrete GPU, 3G/4G card, 8 GB RAM, 256/512 GB SSDs, ports, and battery options.
The market is there and people are willing to pay $5k for an incredible MBA. I don't care what the price is... I just want ALL of the high-end specs to be available via BTO options. Why not please many segments of the ultraportable market? Just consider the original MBA being priced from $1799 all the way to $3099... that is the kind of range that should be available in a luxury product.
I don't care that the Vaio Z costs $5k, to me that's an advantage not disadvantage from the MBA and MBP. The Z also can please a wider range of audience from the ultraportable market. In my opinion, when Apple introduced the iPad, it gave them free reign to really tackle the high-end market with its MBA...