Water is essential. Coke is not. Coke is a luxury just like a phone is a luxury, the analogy fits perfectly.
Coke is cheaper than bottled water in many countries.
What was that again?
Water is essential. Coke is not. Coke is a luxury just like a phone is a luxury, the analogy fits perfectly.
Coke is cheaper than bottled water in many countries.
What was that again?
Tap water is cheaper than coke in most countries. Once again, you don't need Coke to live. You do need water to live though.
Some like both bottled water and Pepsi.
Must I live on bread and potatoes too?
Meat and Dairy is a luxury. You don't need them to live.
I'd rather the water.
Must I live on bread and potatoes too?
Meat and Dairy is a luxury. You don't need them to live.
... There is also lots AND LOTS of research going into formally verifying and testing the interface for software. Soon it will be possible to objectively judge HCI components in programs.
What big mess is she talking about ? I use android for a while now , and cant fault it in any way , its what a OS on a smart phone should be like ..simple and efficient ..its a phone
A phone was originally made to do just phone calls then some clever guy's got the idea why you would need a computer if you could surf the web (wap) on your phone too , then came Apple and offered the first iPhone , and offered the people the whole internet and another couple thousand of apps with questionable use on a phone .
IF i want Apps i get a computer and not a phone in first place , if i want to make pictures i get a proper digital camera .
OK Apple is changing it with making OSX iOS like and soon there will be only one OS in Mac's, iPhones and iPad's , Lion is only a taster and if it sells good Apple knows what the market needs iOS 6 or 7 instead of OSX 10.8
While I only use Apple products, OSX and iOS I will admit a similar chastising article detailing the restrictions and even shortcomings of iOS could be written (and probably has)
The approaches are different, not better
And each user is free to determine which model best meets their needs
For me, that is iOS, but I realize my choice isn't for everyone
There are things I can do on a Samsung that simply aren't possible on an iPhone today, or in the future. Doesn't matter if I compare my phone today with an iPhone 5, 6, or even 7.
This. In the grand scheme of things, her opinion is anecdotal.I think "by last chance", Molly meant last chance with her.
Ummm you're contradicting yourself. Android phones also are phones with internet access, and what are useless apps to you are useful to someone else. No one thought smartphones would relace computers-some thought and think tablets which is also wrong but I digress.
This. In the grand scheme of things, her opinion is anecdotal.
I've only had HCI 101 yet, and even I know that's a bullcrap statement.
Sweet. Call some of the biggest Comp Sci Universities bullcrap.
I assume you meant 'to' windows. Kind of ironic, given how much I've hated Windows over the years, but it could happen, and it could be an improvement. Google's every bit as bad as MS ever was, in slightly different ways.... Now there is talk about jumping from Windows Phone from both the blackberry and Android user groups.
I assume you meant 'to' windows. Kind of ironic, given how much I've hated Windows over the years, but it could happen, and it could be an improvement. Google's every bit as bad as MS ever was, in slightly different ways.
Really? So Coke isn't outselling Pepsi in the US? Of course that's pretty beside the point as you still refuse to see the forest for the trees.The statistics in the analogy are flawed, therefore the analogy itself is flawed.
I would say its a company once again not truly understanding their users and target market.
Recent Examples: Wave, Google+, GO Language.
Poppycock. Open and "Free" does not translate to *****. Android is a mess because of Google's lack of strong leadership.
I have to agree with this. The "open and free" argument is ridiculous since most people use Android as a regular phone not to tinker with.
Google has long promised to help thwart the extreme fragmentation issue but has yet to do so. Sure, the end user may not directly see the fragmentation issue (since some seem to think its a myth) but I assure you the developers do.
I would love to be able to release a game I've been working on for both iOS and Android at the same time, but the fragmentation of Android prevents that.
Sure the game works on some phones, but without a minimum guaranteed performance standard on Android I cant guarantee which phones it will work on, which it won't, and which it will have issues on. As an indie dev I don't have the resources to test it all so unfortunately launching on Android as of now is not a possibility.
And this is where users get affected. Devs shy away because Google hasn't been keeping up with the promised changes.
"Open and free" sounds great until you realize the side effect is fragmentation. All Google needs to do is implement minimum performance standards on handsets, but if they do then people will throw a fit that Android isn't open anymore and we are back to square one.