Is it just me or is there really not that much new and exciting in Monterey?
You're right, however I don't think that's the point of this years release.Is it just me or is there really not that much new and exciting in Monterey?
Monterey includes Shortcuts app. Just that feature makes Monterey pretty exciting.Is it just me or is there really not that much new and exciting in Monterey?
I fully agree with you. However, I’d say internally, the big jump was on Catalina. Then, the UI big jump was on Big Sur. But yeah, the next upcoming years the new versions will be merely incremental.You're right, however I don't think that's the point of this years release.
The jump from Catalina to Big Sur was a big one. By comparison it was a lot more exciting than Monterey, but not every release can bring about major interface & system changes year-in year-out.
I expect the next couple of macOS releases to be more incremental in nature, like Monterey. Not every year will fetch bucket loads of new and exciting features - and that's a good thing.
When you consider Apple's latest OS's are buggy enough without the plethora of headlining new features (iOS 15 I'm looking at you), I'd actually prefer them to dedicate a few releases to just being smaller, Snow Leopard-esque refinements to the OS. First and foremost it's just that, and it's functionality should come first.
Me personally, I'm just happy I can permanently show the menubar in full screen mode Been wanting that feature since Lion.
can you clarify? have been on macs since 1995, and don't get it. limited how? monterey runs beautifully on my GF's new pro (she got it this morning). it also runs beautifully on my intel macs. so... what's the problem, exactly?Those who have been around for a while will understand this…
What we are witnessing with macOS is the transition away from an era. Apple is currently somewhat limited in how many things they can push because they are going through an architectural shift. I’m guessing the next macOS update will be the last as Intel products are being sold. We will have our “Snow Leopard” release in 4-5 years. Apple Silicon only, refined.
It's a bit odd. And it's a shame that the OS-specific landscape photography has gone. Was there nothing picturesque to shoot in Monterey?OK, I gotta say this, the desktop background is awful. Apart from that it seems OK.
Agree, the most exciting thing is the background ... ugly as f-ck 😄Is it just me or is there really not that much new and exciting in Monterey?
Was there nothing picturesque to shoot in Monterey?
Is it just me or is there really not that much new and exciting in Monterey?
big sur was not buggy for everyone, and i doubt we'll ever see a 'feature-less' OS. monterey here (since the betas, and now on the official release), is fast & stable, on both of my macs...I would skip it directly, no interesting features for me that worth the upgrade and there will be potential bugs with each dot upgrade. I think macOS need a feature-less release focused in stability, performance, fixing bugs and UI refinement. Big Sur is still buggy, and we are at the end of the cycle. :/
So I don't want to get down some speculative path since we don't know exactly what apple has in mind, but one clear example would be what they can do in terms of the old idea of your operating system "booting" or "restarting" so often. I believe the macbooks will be always on devices such as your iPhone/iPad. The battery life is already there for those machines to support something like this and apple having full control of the system at this point I don't see how this is not the standard once Intel is completely out of the picture.can you clarify? have been on macs since 1995, and don't get it. limited how? monterey runs beautifully on my GF's new pro (she got it this morning). it also runs beautifully on my intel macs. so... what's the problem, exactly?
honestly, am more confused than before. and the startup chime can be turned on or off in system preferences (i've had that 'off' on my macs since forever...)So I don't want to get down some speculative path since we don't know exactly what apple has in mind, but one clear example would be what they can do in terms of the old idea of your operating system "booting" or "restarting" so often. I believe the macbooks will be always on devices such as your iPhone/iPad. The battery life is already there for those machines to support something like this and apple having full control of the system at this point I don't see how this is not the standard once Intel is completely out of the picture.
They better not take away our startup chime though or I will file the change.org petition myself.
lol I am just joking since people were so mad when Apple took it away a few years ago. I think this was in 2016.honestly, am more confused than before. and the startup chime can be turned on or off in system preferences (i've had that 'off' on my macs since forever...)