Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

tsialex

Contributor
Jun 13, 2016
13,454
13,601
Ok I can't explain it then - I didn't know that about 4K (and I trust you are correct) but I'm also confident on installation I saw higher speeds

Can a newly-formatted drive report inaccurate results?

I'll re-run my Blackmagic test

You can't also get more than ~1450MB/s for two other reasons, the Intel DSL5520 Thunderbolt 2 Controllers are still based on PCIe v2.0 tech (x4 connection) and Apple connected the three Intel TB2 controllers to a PLX PEX 8723 switch configured to 4 PCIe v2.0 x4 downstream ports:

late-2013-mac-pro-system-block-diagram.png


You surely can get better performance than the internal SSD (very easy if you got an older MacPro6,1 with the original SSUAX, the first SSD model used with all earlier than 2018-ish built late-2013 Mac Pros, the later made ones had the improved SSUBX and some people say that the very last made even had the SSPOLARIS), but not a better throughput than the double bottleneck of the x4 PCIe v2.0 connection.
 

FilthyMcNasty

macrumors member
Sep 2, 2014
76
5
Ok sorry if I misled anyone - not intended, I don't know if it was a brainfart or Blackmagic misreporting but I'll be wiping the NVME and testing when time permits..

That's a really useful diagram @tsialex - thank you!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.