Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

shokunin

macrumors regular
Jun 7, 2005
218
48
AMD just announced a 16 Core CPU for $799... PCIE4 and people somehow stick up for the MacPro 8 Core at $6000

But ECC RAM fam and 7 PCIe slots, it's a Pro it's not meant for you... blah blah blah

16 Core TDP of 105

It's even cheaper, $749 for the Ryzen 9 3950x.
 

mavericks7913

Suspended
May 17, 2014
812
281
sorry I forgot all pros need to work off of servers

I mean both Xeon and Epyc are server CPU for better durability by decreasing the clock speed. You can check iMac Pro's CPU and Intel Core X series. If you gonna compare with Xeon, you gotta compare it with Epyc.
 

ekwipt

macrumors 65816
Jan 14, 2008
1,069
362
I mean both Xeon and Epyc are server CPU for better durability by decreasing the clock speed. You can check iMac Pro's CPU and Intel Core X series. If you gonna compare with Xeon, you gotta compare it with Epyc.

I know you are right but the thing is most Pros don't need server anything, give us high cpu Core count a few PCIe slots (3-4 would suit most) , fast RAM ( 128Gb at the most) and powerful graphics cards (Latest AMD) and call it day
 

AidenShaw

macrumors P6
Feb 8, 2003
18,667
4,677
The Peninsula
No of course not Aiden, we all know the MacPro starts at 8 Core, so keep your boggling mind settled down
"AMD just announced a 16 Core CPU for $799... PCIE4 and people somehow stick up for the MacPro 8 Core at $6000"

If that isn't comparing a CPU price to a system price....the mind boggles.

And please list all of the PCIe 4.0 devices that you can connect to that not-yet-shipping CPU....
 
Last edited by a moderator:

ekwipt

macrumors 65816
Jan 14, 2008
1,069
362
Oh, Mr. Trump, this is another lie.

"AMD just announced a 16 Core CPU for $799... PCIE4 and people somehow stick up for the MacPro 8 Core at $6000"

If that isn't comparing a CPU price to a system price....

https://www.engadget.com/2019/05/31/gigabyte-aorus-nvme-pcie4-ssd/

The AORUS NVMe Gen4 SSD can hit up to 5,000MB/s read speeds and 4,400 MB/s write performance. That's about 56 percent faster read and over double the write speeds of Samsung's 970 EVO, currently one of the fastest NVMe SSDs on the market.

Gigabyte isn't the only company to launch a PCI 4.0 SSD, as Corsair also unveiled the MP600 NVMe SSD with very similar performance. Both products use the Phison PS5016-E16 controller and 3D TLC (triple-level cell) NAND flash memory chips (from Toshiba, in the case of the AORUS).

https://www.techradar.com/au/news/amd-radeon-rx-5700-rx-5700-xt

New Graphics cards running at PCIe4
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: crjackson2134

mavericks7913

Suspended
May 17, 2014
812
281
I know you are right but the thing is most Pros don't need server anything, give us high cpu Core count a few PCIe slots (3-4 would suit most) , fast RAM ( 128Gb at the most) and powerful graphics cards (Latest AMD) and call it day

Sadly, because of iMac Pro, that wont gonna happen soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ekwipt

tsialex

Contributor
Jun 13, 2016
13,455
13,602
Well, servers require a faster PCIe speed so it's a different story.
Please show me a server that have PCIe 5.0 today? Any server.

PCIe 5.0 will be a 2021, or later, product. It was ratified less than two weeks ago and will be announced at PCI-SIG dev conference on June 18.
 
  • Like
Reactions: crjackson2134

deconstruct60

macrumors G5
Mar 10, 2009
12,493
4,053
it depends on what intel does. They may just move to pcie 5

They are highly likely going to move to PCIe 4 first. 1-2 years ago they had to commit to the work that will come out in 2020. PCIe 5 wasn't done then and they really didn't need more risk ( fab process had already blown up in their face).

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/i...-5.0-roadmap-leaked-granite-rapids,39403.html

You can't just 'slap' PCIe v5 on the CPU without working out a substantially faster internal bandwidth to the CPU package. ( if double the amount of data coming in you have to then move that data to the CPUs without substantially blocking. If adding more cores also then have to route all of that also without major traffic jams. ).

Sunny Cove / Ice Lake was a micro-arch change that Intel worked over last couple of years. PCIi-e v4 was relatively well know over that time so they weaved it in. PCI-e v5 is going to have to wait for the next micro-architectural bump and that isn't coming out of the pipeline until 2021.

AMD side stepped that a bit by forking off the I/O connections into a seperate chiplet and also just doubliing the width of Infinity Fabric. Trying to double the width of Ifinity Fabric again is going to be awkward. They need something else for PCI-e v5 for much of the same reasons why Intel needs something new for PCi-e v4.

Intel is moving to PCI-e v5

"... The use of PCIe Gen 5.0 is also a big element to Agilex, as it allows customers to connect directly with future PCIe 5.0 host devices, but it also allows for Intel’s new Compute eXpress Link technology, which builds upon the PCIe 5.0 physical standards. ..."
https://www.anandtech.com/show/14149/intel-agilex-10nm-fpgas-with-pcie-50-ddr5-and-cxl

But they aren't going to skip v4 on the CPU side. CXL is another relatively new wrinkle to what they have planned going forward and it will take a while to weave that into the CPUs.


If Global Foundaries hadn't thrown a curve ball at IBM's Power10 path that probably would have been the first major move to PCie v5.
 
  • Like
Reactions: filterdecay

ZombiePhysicist

Suspended
May 22, 2014
2,884
2,794
Here’s another new pcie4 ssd we won’t be able to use at speed whenever apple (the maker and seller of fine vintage computers) gets around to actually shipping its over priced and underpowered juicer. Oh you say it’s a cheese grater? No, it’s an Apple loyalist money juicer.



1571609988172.jpeg
 

sirio76

macrumors 6502a
Mar 28, 2013
578
416
PCIe 3 cards go up to 14GB/s, I can't see how 15GB/s will make any difference in real world usage.
You can even use 2 card and get about 28GB/s
 

ZombiePhysicist

Suspended
May 22, 2014
2,884
2,794
PCIe 3 cards go up to 14GB/s, I can't see how 15GB/s will make any difference in real world usage.
You can even use 2 card and get about 28GB/s

Yea, that's theoretical. Real world will be less. And how many lanes is that? Yea right. Exactly. But please, keep letting us know how great it is to have half the bandwidth but pay double the price for it...
 

sirio76

macrumors 6502a
Mar 28, 2013
578
416
Also the 15GB/s is theoretical. The MP can accommodate two of that card and still have lanes for multi GPU setup ecc.
 
Last edited:

ZombiePhysicist

Suspended
May 22, 2014
2,884
2,794
Also the 15GB/s is theoretical. The MP can accommodate two of that card and still have lanes for multi GPU setup ecc.

I don’t believe the 15 is theoretical but actual If it’s filled out. But again please, more apologies for half the bandwidth at twice the cost...
 

sirio76

macrumors 6502a
Mar 28, 2013
578
416
Then buy a PC with PCIe4 and be happy, what are you still doing here? I'm pretty sure if I go in a PC forum telling PC folks how great Mac are(there are many good reason to enjoy a Mac) they will quickly label me as a troll.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zdigital2015
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.