Which model iPod allows you to upgrade the firmware to the current generation?
And which iPod has sync capablilty via WiFi?
ATTENTION: Please keep the edge of the cliff clear, so all Fanboys and iSheep can easily make it safely off the edge with the rest of the lemmings.
The 3G iPod got the 4G iPod's featuresa bit later, as I believe did the 1/2G iPods at the same time.
When was the last time Apple offered firmware updates for "previous generation" iPod owners?
Maybe they should start by making it Mac compatible.![]()
1/2gen iPods never got G4 firmware updates, the most they got were the features of the 3G iPod when it first came out.
Personally, I can not wait to try the new Zune software... and I really wish the iPod Classic could get wireless sync, wireless multi-player games, and a 3D GUI.
I agree, the zune is horrible.. It would have been a great device if this was November 2001...![]()
I still don't understand how anybody could possibly think the front of that looks decent. I mean, the designs on the back are sexy as hell, but the thick beveled puke-green face of it is terrible. I'm seriously trying to like it, but I cringe every time I look at that picture. The brown Zune looked much sexier.
The general consensus among reviewers right now is that the new 80gb Zune > the iPod Classic in almost every catagory except maximum capacity and battery life.
Microsoft seems to have gotten their act together. This is good news.
Hell, if they'd add Mac compatibility to the thing I'd probably get one over a Classic.
The classics were a bit of a disappointment, I think Apple wants everyone to go down the touch route.
The artwork on the back is stunning.
I like the green colour on the flash Zune, I think it is classy, but don't like other parts of the design. The Zune Pad looks fine, it's the other buttons and the big black border around the screen.
They will appeal to people seeking an alternative, but offer nothing significantly better over iPod + iTunes.
The classics were a bit of a disappointment, I think Apple wants everyone to go down the touch route.
I don't think the buttons on the Zune players are that much different from other players. There are some Samsung players that are better, and plenty of cell phones that can play AAC files and have over 4GB of memory.
Wrong. How can Apple prefer people buy the Touch when it only has up to 16GB storage? To me it was a no brainer, I bought the 160GB Classic because it is small and has tons of space. I don't even have mine half filled yet but it's fun trying. I have my 8GB iPhone but I prefer to use my Classic when listening to music simply because I have everything on it. I don't have to go home every night and change the music on it when I want something differant.
It's not the buttons themselves, it's the positioning in relation to the other elements on the front on the Zune. I should have been clearer.
Probably all the new OS X based iPods (Nano, Classic, Touch, and iPhone).
There is no way someone is going to prove that the Zune's stylings -- i do love the artwork on the back though -- and features are better than having 160GB of space for the price of the Zune's 80GB.
How is the 80GB Zune the same price as a 160GB iPod?
The 80GB Zune is the same price as an 80GB iPod.
I personally prefer the new Zune's styling over the iPod classic, the customizable "tatoos" on the back are just stunning. I also think that the UI is prettier, and from what I have seen in the UI demos, very intuiative and responsive.
I don't know why so many people think that this is a bad thing... Let Microsoft take some of Apple's market. It will only lead to good things. A good example is AMD vs. Intel. If AMD didn't kick the **** out of Intel in the early 2000's, do you think we would have the Core 2 Duo of today?
I don't think that's the case at all. There is nothing in the Zune besides WiFi that makes it any better than the Classic. I will give credit to the Zune's UI which was much better than the Video iPod's, but saying that the Zune is better in every aspect is just plain denial and illogical.