Nano-texture display

[Macintosh101]

Anyone thinking of going with the Nano-Texture option on the new MBPs?

I've been using the iPad Pro M4 with Nano texture after being fully converted as to its merits, but it's only available on the 1TB model and upwards for the iPP.

I see that Apple hasn't put any such restrictions on the new M4 MacBook Pro - you can get the Nano-Texture option with the base model.

 

[ctjack]

I think nano is a no-brainer to fight eyestrain especially since apple charges so "low" on MBPs - on ipads i am not ready to pay 1/2TB prices just to get the nano screen.

 

[AdmiralKirk]

This is bugging me now too. Since this is an unexpected option I have decision paralysis on whether to go with it or not. I’ve never seen one in person. Are they really that much better?

My ideal configuration right now is a hair shy of £3000 😭

 

[Macintosh101]

This is bugging me now too. Since this is an unexpected option I have decision paralysis on whether to go with it or not. I’ve never seen one in person. Are they really that much better?

My ideal configuration right now is a hair shy of £3000 😭

The nano-texture on the iPad Pro is incredible - simply because it's so inconsistent across lighting conditions and massively reduces eye strain. However, it might be a good idea to wait to see one in person to see how its implemented on the MacBook Pro, as there may be a difference compared to the iPP which has tandem OLED.

 

[ctjack]

This is bugging me now too. Since this is an unexpected option I have decision paralysis on whether to go with it or not. I’ve never seen one in person. Are they really that much better?

My ideal configuration right now is a hair shy of £3000 😭

They are not "better". Like is broccoli better than french fries? It kinda depends from which standpoint.

Is is better for eyes, against eyestrain, but it will have that a slight touch of matte screen feel. Closest you can get just order any matter screen film for your iphone and ipad and see if you liked it. Obviously being integrated it will be a notch better from apple in nano form versus regular matte film on iphone.

 

[jabbr]

There is a trade off with clarity and contrast in brighter environments. I guess it depends on how much glare bothers you.

does the notch include the coating?

 

[Macintosh101]

They are not "better". Like is broccoli better than french fries? It kinda depends from which standpoint.

Is is better for eyes, against eyestrain, but it will have that a slight touch of matte screen feel. Closest you can get just order any matter screen film for your iphone and ipad and see if you liked it. Obviously being integrated it will be a notch better from apple in nano form versus regular matte film on iphone.

One thing I would say from my experience is that the Nano-Texure display cant really be compared to a matte screen protector / film - at least that was the cases with the iPad anyway. I tried tons of matte screen protectors over the years on my iPad and the nano texture is vastly superior.

 

[ctjack]

One thing I would say from my experience is that the Nano-Texure display cant really be compared to a matte screen protector / film - at least that was the cases with the iPad anyway. I tried tons of matte screen protectors over the years on my iPad and the nano texture is vastly superior.

Yeah, they are superior because it almost like if matte film screen protector was ingrained into the screen at production. That is what essentially nano is - beefed up matte screen. So if one likes matte feel, then they will for sure enjoy nano as an improved matte variant with less blemishes.

I personaly like matte films on my iphone, except troubles sliding finger cause of the resistance. But luckily we don't have to touch MBP displays for now.

 

[Macintosh101]

Yeah, they are superior because it almost like if matte film screen protector was ingrained into the screen at production. That is what essentially nano is - beefed up matte screen. So if one likes matte feel, then they will for sure enjoy nano as an improved matte variant with less blemishes.

I personaly like matte films on my iphone, except troubles sliding finger cause of the resistance. But luckily we don't have to touch MBP displays for now.

one of the interesting things about the nano texture screen on the iPad is its silky smooth - no friction at all, especially compared to the normal glossy screen.

 

[ctjack]

one of the interesting things about the nano texture screen on the iPad is its silky smooth - no friction at all, especially compared to the normal glossy screen.

And some people say it is even smoother than the regular screen. I think it is a no brainer overall since it is not paywalled behind 1/2TB ssd requirement.

 

[Apple_Robert]

one of the interesting things about the nano texture screen on the iPad is its silky smooth - no friction at all, especially compared to the normal glossy screen.

I use a stylist (when not writing) on my nano iPad and it is like you said. Using a stylus on the standard glass gives noticeable friction. Using a stylist keeps my screen free of fingerprints

 

[ctjack]

I use a stylist (when not writing) on my nano iPad and it is like you said. Using a stylus on the standard glass gives noticeable friction. Using a stylist keeps my screen free of fingerprints

fingerprint are less obvious on nano as well.

 

[Apple_Robert]

fingerprint are less obvious on nano as well.

That is true. The less I have to clean the nano the better. I aLeo occasionally use a feather soft duster to gently wipe the screen of dust as well.

 

[Aka757]

After using the nano-texture M4 iPad Pro, I pre-ordered a nano-texture M4 MBP. Interested to see how it pans out on the laptops. May switch it out for standard display if I don’t like it, but I expect that I will enjoy it after getting used to it already.

 

[Macalway]

I own the Nano iPad. I think the technology in general has made these much better.

Blacks do look different, but to my eyes it's actually blacker, as black surfaces seem to show reflections the most. I say go for it. You can always return it.

Btw, Samsung Galaxy Tab Pros are all matte now. It's Corning Gorilla Glass for Samsung, I think. It's not a subtle matte either Really good. I predict you're going to see it more often, as companies compete.

 

[Macintosh101]

It's not like it used to be. I own the Nano iPad, btw. But it's not just Apple, the technology in general has made these much, much, better. Matte used to be black = grey + sparkles . Now that's all gone.

Sure the blacks do look different, but to my eyes it's actually blacker, as black surfaces seem to show reflections the most. I say go for it. You can always return it.

After using a few new matte screens the distaste I had for matte has now shifted to glossy. My only peeve now is why TF is the iPad still requiring 1GB for nano?

Something to look at. Samsung Galaxy Tab Pros are all matte now. I've used them and they look like the same type of screen Apple uses. It's Corning Gorilla Glass for Samsung, I think. It's not a subtle matte either, and it's really good. Check it
out. I predict you're going to see it everywhere, as companies compete.

Yeah I was surprised Apple didn’t offer an option on this year’s iPhone.

 

[PotentPeas]

I've been hoping that they would offer this on MacBook Pro since they announced it for iPad Pro. I'm actually surprised it came so quickly. I'm not ready for a MacBook upgrade yet (M2 Max system here), but, I really want to see what this looks like in person, to see whether it really impacts the screen clarity or colors that much. To me, seeing it in person would be a prerequisite to buying a system with it. Hopefully Apple stores have them on display soon...?

 

[AuNate]

I went for the standard. The matte/nano on the iPad that I had was not durable, and I can't stand tiny scratches all over my screen. Apple replaced my first one and the replacement wound up with the same issue. I don't baby my devices, but I certainly don't abuse them. Also, the matte, to my eyes at least, blurs text a bit, so it actually strained my eyes when reading. I was hopeful that it would lived up to the hype, but for me, it was disappointing. YMMV, but I'd rather deal with glare that I can address by re-angling, than the downsides of nano. Standard is cheaper too.

 

[kgphotos]

I just got the Nano Texture Studio Display. Using it with my M3 Max MBP. Gotta say I prefer the Nano Texture over the glossy MBP. I almost want to upgrade just for Nano Texture so the screens match. It’s that good. But then again, maybe I’ll just save my money and put it towards something special like a vacation. M3 Max is fine otherwise . Decisions, decisions.

 

[green_anthony]

I went for the standard. The matte/nano on the iPad that I had was not durable, and I can't stand tiny scratches all over my screen. Apple replaced my first one and the replacement wound up with the same issue. I don't baby my devices, but I certainly don't abuse them. Also, the matte, to my eyes at least, blurs text a bit, so it actually strained my eyes when reading. I was hopeful that it would lived up to the hype, but for me, it was disappointing. YMMV, but I'd rather deal with glare that I can address by re-angling, than the downsides of nano. Standard is cheaper too.

I also went for the standard for the simple reason that I do not remember the last time I was bothered by the sun while on my laptop.

Who works at the beach here ? 😂

 

[Macintosh101]

I went for the standard. The matte/nano on the iPad that I had was not durable, and I can't stand tiny scratches all over my screen. Apple replaced my first one and the replacement wound up with the same issue. I don't baby my devices, but I certainly don't abuse them. Also, the matte, to my eyes at least, blurs text a bit, so it actually strained my eyes when reading. I was hopeful that it would lived up to the hype, but for me, it was disappointing. YMMV, but I'd rather deal with glare that I can address by re-angling, than the downsides of nano. Standard is cheaper too.

Any idea what caused the scratches? I use the nano texture for several hours a day, in a variety of environments, and haven’t had any scratches, so I’m curious what you think caused them.

 

[AuNate]

Any idea what caused the scratches? I use the nano texture for several hours a day, in a variety of environments, and haven’t had any scratches, so I’m curious what you think caused them.

I really have no idea. That's the frustrating part. I only used my fingers on the screens. Nothing else, as far as I know, ever touched either of them, other than an occasional wipe down with the Apple cloth (which you have to use...oddly enough, normal screen wiping cloths do nothing).

 

[Cyberome]

Standard vs. NT all depends on how you intend to use the laptop. In a dark room, the standard offers the best image quality. In a sunny environment, the NT will reduce the glare (at the cost of having ever so slightly blurry text/images).

Hopefully, they will have side-by-side display models at their stores. That way, it will be easier for people to make a decision.

I’m personally leaning towards the standard, since it has the sharpest images under ideal conditions + I don’t really notice the glare with my current 2019 MacBook Pro (which is significantly dimmer than the M4 screens). However, I’d like to see the NT before making a final decision. $7k (maxed out specs) is a lot for a laptop.

 

[Apple_Robert]

Standard vs. NT all depends on how you intend to use the laptop. In a dark room, the standard offers the best image quality. In a sunny environment, the NT will reduce the glare (at the cost of having ever so slightly blurry text/images).

Hopefully, they will have side-by-side display models at their stores. That way, it will be easier for people to make a decision.

I’m personally leaning towards the standard, since it has the sharpest images under ideal conditions + I don’t really notice the glare with my current 2019 MacBook Pro (which is significantly dimmer than the M4 screens). However, I’d like to see the NT before making a final decision. $7k (maxed out specs) is a lot for a laptop.

With how tech changes so frequently, why get a maxed model, unless you are set on keeping the Mac for at least 5+ years?

 

[JSRinUK]

This is bugging me now too. Since this is an unexpected option I have decision paralysis on whether to go with it or not. I’ve never seen one in person. Are they really that much better?

My ideal configuration right now is a hair shy of £3000 😭

I had the same decision paralysis when I saw the option.

I had a budget in mind, and an “upper limit” I was prepared to spend on spec bumps. Then I saw the nano-texture option. No idea what it is really, but was prepared to risk it if I could find a definitive answer quickly. Without one, I chose to go standard and use the money I might have spent on NT to bump the SSD instead. It’ll probably be more use to me in the final analysis.