I didn't mean to sound condescending or demeaning by my previous post- but it's just that every piece of evidence I can find on the web indicates that this lens mount is metal. Yours is the only one who claims their mount is plastic (aside from pre-release speculation posts made just after the lens was announced last year). Unless you somehow got a prototype they made with a plastic mount or something...?
A picture would really help confirm this. It sounds so unlikely for there to be multiple versions of this lens (especially because it was recently released and a revision in the design is unlikely), and the possibility of a counerfit or a fake seems a little absurd (I have never heard of a faked Nikon lens, although with the recent news about the "faked" Intel i7 CPUs... I guess nothing's too far fetched). I might even suggest a call to Nikon to verify that your plastic mount lens is legit? Again, with respect, something just doesn't add up.
Lastly, just an aside about the hood- the bayonet hood is not necessarily a bad thing, I believe it was partially designed to be like that in the case of a lens drop it will break away from the lens, the act of which will absorb a lot of the fall energy potentially protecting the lens. Kind of like the crumple zones on a car. If you bolted a hood on really securely it might not protect the lens as well from the impact shock. I know the vast majority of modern Nikons use the bayonet or some kind of clip-in style. Only the older lenses and the heavy supertelephotos use the screw style now.
Ruahrc
Hi again, as I have asserted the mount is indeed plastic. The copy of the lens I have was purchased at "Centre Japanois de la Photo" at the Montreal Eaton Centre, They price matched Royal Photo's 259.00 price.
I'd gladly take a picture for you but considering the lens is on an aircraft bound for Cuba on my best friends D50 this is not going to happen until she returns next week ( I told you I don't use it much )
There does in fact seem to be two versions of this lens, and I did contact Nikon this afternoon as well as several local camera stores. "Japan Camera" as I will call them (since I am english) only has the plastic lens mount in stock.. I encourage anyone local to go check it out for themselves! Royal Photo on the other hand only has the metal mount! and they claim to have not seen the plastic mount and they claim they get stock from Nikon several times a week! When I questioned Japan Camera they said they also get stock several times a week and have not seen a metal mount since the first few shipments they had of this lens which they said was last spring.
Something is messed up! so I decided to call Nikon here in Montreal, I spoke with a nice lady who was not aware of different mounts on the lenses but has forwarded my inquiry to the regional sales rep for my area and I expect a call tomorrow. As a side note I plan to request they exchange my lens for the metal mount version as to me thats much better! When I bought this lens.. Japan Camera told me thats how the lens is made and that Nikon is changing over to plastic mounts. ( I did not believe this much but figured ok its a lower end consumer lens so this is probably why )
I have a Nikon hood on my 1.4 and its a screw in type and is made from flared rubber material, it solid and it does not move once put in place, same as my 85mm 1.8 but I understand thats an older metal lens and a more expensive lens to start with.
The 35mm f/1.8 certainly has a metal mount, I have never heard of a plastic mount version and doubt there are any. Are you confusing the plastic piece that has the electrical contacts on it with the actual mount? If you really do have a plastic mount please post a picture.
Again, I have been at this long enough to know a plastic mount when I see it