Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
  • Like
Reactions: Max(IT)
Tha


Thanks mate, I think I will do that and yes my Mrs is a teacher so we will go for the discount. From what I have read SSD is well worth it, so is the 4K retina, and I will not need to upgrade from 8 to 16gb of RAM. That is my budget maxed out.
Did you buy it ?

I disagree with people who say "Absolutely do not get anything without <this or that>" These things are not absolutes. They are balances of cost and features with an eye to the sorts of uses you have for the computer.

I much prefer SSD. I think it's the better choice. HOWEVER this choice comes at a cost in money and storage capacity. I have the money and I don't need a lot of storage capacity so I chose 256 GB SSD. However, one of Apple's selling points, which the folks complaining about the high price of its products fail to understand, is its commitment to quality. And if money is an object (which in your case apparently it is) an HDD will give you reliable storage at a lower cost. By getting the 265 GB SSD I got 1/4 the storage and paid an extra $200 plus tax. For me, that was a good choice.

But when someone says "Absolutely never get an HDD because they fail," well, the HDD in my old 9-year-old 5,1 iMac still works just fine and is likely to keep working for the next owner of that machine.

An SSD will be faster than an HDD, and might be faster for some kinds of disk usage than a Fusion drive, but again, only you can decide if that faster speed is worth the money. And a lot of people report that the Fusion drive is as fast or nearly as fast as the SSD, and provides a lot more storage for the price. It is for me. But that's me, and I can afford it. Consider your budget and how much storage you need.

well, I agree with you, but an HDD on a 2015/2016 computer is a non sense in my opinion
 
What in the world are you talking about? The 5,1 had an X1600. The 16,1 has at minimum, Intel's HD 6000, which is almost 50x faster than your old X1600. The optional Iris Pro 6200 is over 75x faster.

http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-HD-6000-Mobile-vs-AMD-Radeon-X1600/m24946vsm9407

Sorry. What I meant is that it has the same number of pixels. Since I do nothing that's graphics-intensive, I don't care about graphics processor speed. I do care about display resolution and that's the only graphics spec I was looking at.

But thanks for the clarification.
 
For those advocating 256gb ssd, is there a huge performance difference b/w the 21.5 iMac with a 256gb ssd compared to a rMBP with a 256gb ssd? I'm torn between the 2 and I'm wondering if this issue is as simple as a "desktop vs laptop" or is there a significant difference in performance? TIA!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.