They should have moved onto cheeses. There are thousands of cheeses.
I should then point out that many folks still don't know how to pronounce OS X.
(hint - it's not "Oh Ess Ex")
And, remember when Apple was first publicly using system names when OS X 10.2 was announced, and all the kerfuffle about how to pronounce "Jaguar".
I suspect that most folks don't care about the pronunciation anyway
Of course, everyone will agree with me that the only correct pronunciation is "Yoh Smit"
In the UK, we pronounce it:
"yo-semit-ee"
(soft and nearly silent letter 't')
Yosemite is a dreadful name and tons of people have no idea how to pronounce it.
That would work, fits their marketing strategy to a tee.The next OS could be called SAMCRO for all any one cares. Everyone knows its from Apple, and thats what matters.
Men, I don't care about the name, though I think it would have been cool if they would have moved to celestial objects.
OS X Orion
OS X Andromeda
Etc.
Yes, then the following release should be "OS X The Big One".
I still think Apple should consider the following names:
OS X Mammoth
OS X Mt. Shasta
OS X Pacific Coast
I don't know why, but I seem to remember all the names of the OSes with no problem and the fact that they are naming the OSes after California landmarks makes it even easier to remember (SoCal native here).
For those who don't know how to pronounce Yosemite, in California (and I'm sure most of the OS) we pronounce it:
yoh-sem-i-tee
You may not agree with me, but, IMHO, the new name schemes for OS X became too US-centric.
Before Mavericks, Apple named their OS X versions with big cats. This was a wise scheme in my opinion, as these names connect to anybody. It is easy for anybody anywhere in the world to identify and connect to tigers, leopards and lions. In addition, each of these big cats live in different places worldwide, and the images of these animals always depicted a different place in the world, which is where such animals lived. It had worldwide appeal.
With Mavericks, Apple introduced a new naming scheme. OS X versions would be named after places. Mavericks was the first. Now, Yosemite. Both places in California. This naming scheme may have an appeal in the US, but not worldwide appeal.
Mavericks? Who outside of the US knows what Mavericks is, apart from surfers? Yosemite is at least more widely known, but still. Why not use worldwide locations instead?
I don't really care about the name Apple gives to the OS. However, I think this is a poor marketing strategy since it is alienating foreign customers, which are the ones Apple should be focusing at.
If you want _really_ california-centric - I'm looking forward to
I expect that will be version 10.13