I'm considering ordering a base-config nMP. Will I be able to stick a larger SSD in? The prices Apple charges here in Switzerland for the upgrades are quite insane.
Apple uses a custom connector for their current SSDs, so you are out of luck.
That said, a 240GB SSD of similar class costs CHF429 at digitech. And 1TB is usually over $1000 - Apple's prices are really good in comparison. Don't forget - we are talking about SSDs which surpass the performance of the SATA3 interface here.
If you are looking for something more cost effective, USB3 or Thunderbolt might be a choice.
----------
Now that is interesting, I didn't know thatIs it the same connector as in a rMBP?
Apple uses a custom connector for their current SSDs, so you are out of luck.
It's a standard connector, I don't have the link handy but I believe its made by Samsung. OWC will have upgrades shortly.
OWC aka Macsales.com
sells SSD cards for several current Apple Mac products. No reason to think they won't have similar for this Mac.
I'm also not convinced on the "proprietary" bit.
Looks like a mini PCIe similar to what many notebooks use for aircards and such. (Or maybe it's full size 4xpcie? Hard to judge scale).
Either way, if OWC can upgrade your Retina MBP, the nMP should be a cinch.
Still, I'd like to have a bit more specific information on this. So you are saying that the connector used in the MP is different from ones used in rMBP?
OWC MBP SSDStill, I'd like to have a bit more specific information on this. So you are saying that the connector used in the MP is different from ones used in rMBP?
P.S. OWC does not have any SSD for the current MBP/MBA/iMac (the PCI-e ones).
It's a standard connector, I don't have the link handy but I believe its made by Samsung. OWC will have upgrades shortly.
EDIT: nvm, it might actually be a proprietary rMBP connector, they look very much the same:
OWC MBP SSD
MB Air SSD
Not sure about the iMac, possibly they skipped it because the newer "thin" iMacs are even harder to work on than previous gens, so they did not see much market for it.
Still, if the new Mac Pro uses the same connector as the rMBP (they look very similar to me)
also worth pointing out that the cards are using proprietary connectors so a licensing fee will be paid to apple regardless of who's selling the parts.. as in- i think we'll see some cheaper ssd options in the future but not incredibly cheaper..
apple has maneuvered into the position of being able to have more control over third party pricing as well as availability. (i.e.- they'll be collecting apple tax from any ssd upgrades you install in macs)
Still, if the new Mac Pro uses the same connector as the rMBP (they look very similar to me) and Apple says that its user-upgradeable, maybe there is hope that they try to push their connector as a new 'open' standard. Or at least sell the SSDs themselves.
So here's a different question…
If Apple has tweaked things.. will the SSD that you remove be usable in anything if you do get an OWC upgrade that works?
If not, might it be better to order a reasonable one with the nMP, or just the base one, and buy an external TB SSD if you really need that much high speed storage?
So here's a different question
If Apple has tweaked things.. will the SSD that you remove be usable in anything if you do get an OWC upgrade that works?
If not, might it be better to order a reasonable one with the nMP, or just the base one, and buy an external TB SSD if you really need that much high speed storage?
yup, at this point we can only assume there won't be any 3rd party offering the nMP SSD, else the 2013 rMBP & MBA SSD should have been avail at OWC already.
So you will need to decide if you want the SSD speed 900MB/s by upgrading from Apple when you order.
or you could accept slower speed SSD via TB, which mostly hitting around 300~400MB/s. Only 1~2 product I could see them hitting 600 MB/s
It is probably cheaper to go with external TB SSD. It will be just easier to use a larger card with more Flash chips to get to a TB of capacity. One of issues with these narrow "blade" SSD form factors is that there is just limited space for the Flash chips. So have to go with generally more expensive, denser Flash chips to fit inside the limited number on the card.
Hence the reason I decided to go with the 512 on the base Hex.
It is probably cheaper to go with external TB SSD. It will be just easier to use a larger card with more Flash chips to get to a TB of capacity. One of issues with these narrow "blade" SSD form factors is that there is just limited space for the Flash chips. So have to go with generally more expensive, denser Flash chips to fit inside the limited number on the card.
Same here. In my shop 256 gig is just too small for an OS-plus-apps partition but 512 works out just great with some wiggle room left over for my comfort zone (and for my unfortunately necessary Windows 7 VM). Everything else lives in external drive enclosures. Moving data is mostly comprised of unplug and plug.
Current blade SSD is at 1TB, I'm guess when the time for more then 1TB we will be seeing dual blade SSD pairing on Raid 0
To bad nMP only 1 slot for the SSD, they should make it dual instead.
It is a bit early to claim this is some patent troll tactic.
It wold make sense but they are likely out of PCI-e lanes. Especially, if these are x4 PCI-e v2 SSDs instead of x2 PCI-e v3 SSDs. Another x4 lanes when already out isn't particularly going to help much with RAID 0 unless stop using something else.
so if a gpu is at x16 and the ssd is x2 then that means there's x18 going to the one gpu.. which is odd.