That's what I thought before August, 2007 when the mini got a crummy speed bump.On the one hand, the longer they take the more mature the product.
That's what I thought before August, 2007 when the mini got a crummy speed bump.On the one hand, the longer they take the more mature the product.
i need the new mini to be announced by january 24th, thats the last day i can return my apple tv to bestbuy
That makes sense at this point. Apple could sell a lot more software upgrades if they would just go ahead and release a new mini now. But if they don't, we might as well wait and get them for free.I've decided to wait until it actually comes with Snow Leopard and iLife '09 pre-installed...
![]()
Sad indeed that Apple hasnt done squat with Mini, they deserve a serious serious butt kicking. Shame!That was a great thread that was![]()
I had been waiting a few months for the new mini to be my transition from PC to Mac. Im disapointed that it did not come out at Mac World. There are to many signs pointing to a new mac mini coming in the future. I think for me I am going to see if i can find a refurbished or used mini to start my transition so that when the New Mac Mini finially is released I am up to speed. And if it never comes out, I will probably go Macbook over iMac.
save your money. go hackintosh...
Depends on what your time is worth to you. If you don't spend time researching the right hardware to buy, then you spend time playing with kexts and overcoming issues. Then you spend time downloading and doing it all over again when you need to go to a major update which would otherwise break your hackintosh.
So, if you ~like~ playing around and making stuff work, or your time has little to no value, then you can "save your money" by going hackintosh.
If you want to get on and do real work or real play on your Mac, and you value your spare time, then a Hackintosh does NOT save you money. It only saves you Capital Expenditure, but your Operational Expense will be high.
True costs are CapEx plus OpEx. Hackintoshes have high OpEx.
Depends on what your time is worth to you. If you don't spend time researching the right hardware to buy, then you spend time playing with kexts and overcoming issues. Then you spend time downloading and doing it all over again when you need to go to a major update which would otherwise break your hackintosh.
So, if you ~like~ playing around and making stuff work, or your time has little to no value, then you can "save your money" by going hackintosh.
If you want to get on and do real work or real play on your Mac, and you value your spare time, then a Hackintosh does NOT save you money. It only saves you Capital Expenditure, but your Operational Expense will be high.
True costs are CapEx plus OpEx. Hackintoshes have high OpEx.
If you want to get on and do real work or real play on your Mac, and you value your spare time, then a Hackintosh does NOT save you money. It only saves you Capital Expenditure, but your Operational Expense will be high.
True costs are CapEx plus OpEx. Hackintoshes have high OpEx.
So, total time invested - about 10 hours. Total cost of a quad-core Mac Pro - about $2400. Savings of $1400. I'll take that.![]()
It takes less than 30mins to search the right hardware. For same price as mini I can build HC gaming hackintosh
Thanks for the lesson on the Hack Pro...
this is a mini thread.
Your math doesn't hold true on a Mac mini replacement. You can buy a Mac Mini of Craigslist for about $400 any day of the week,
complete with a legal copy OS X.
If you wait and are willing to put in half the hours that you did, you can save even more money.
This is about a mini, not about a Mac Pro...