http://fudzilla.com/news/graphics/43962-new-geforce-will-be-incremental
It basically means that Consumer GPUs will resemble GP100 architecture, not GV100. Which I have told you months before.
It depends on the perspective.Eh gad all new releases are incremental. I can't remember anything truly revolutionary every since compute units were first announced.
I wonder if NVIDIA is going to try MCM after seeing what AMD is doing.It depends on the perspective.
If you come from GP100 - it will be incremental. If you come from GP102 - it will be huge jump.
It depends on the perspective.
If you come from GP100 - it will be incremental. If you come from GP102 - it will be huge jump.
http://research.nvidia.com/sites/de...U:-Multi-Chip-Module-GPUs//p320-Arunkumar.pdfI wonder if NVIDIA is going to try MCM after seeing what AMD is doing.
Links?And when I said few years ago, on this forum, that next generation GPUs will be made from multiple dies, they laughed at me...
It was even before the time, when AMD described scalability as being the next big thing in GPUs.
I remember POWER, but I see that IBM was already using the technology in the 70's.MCM isn't something that ATI just invented.
I wrote: It was before AMD touted Scalability. That post you linked is after AMD touted scalabilityLinks?
Oh here's one. https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/2016-nmp.1952250/page-40#post-22681787
March 2016 (not a few years ago). And I don't even see any replies to your post, let alone laughter.
Also, note that the Nvidia paper cites references back to at least 2005. MCM isn't something that ATI just invented.
Instead of just saying that I'm wrong, how about posting a link that proves that I'm wrong? (And be sure to include the laugh track to support the rest of your claim.I wrote: It was before AMD touted Scalability. That post you linked is after AMD touted scalability.
P.S. I was not saying that AMD has invented this, but that reality that GPUs are made from multiple, smaller dies is 100% done deal.
Any word on form factor - single slot?I have some interesting info from my sources.
GTX 2050 Ti, will not require 6 pin connector, and will give slightly higher performance than GTX 1060 6 GB offered. No word on GDDR memory bandwidth and bus width. Pricing will be around 149-169$, tho.
That is pretty great perspective. Intel i7 7700T plus GTX 2050 Ti can be very efficient 1440p computer.
I have some interesting info from my sources.
GTX 2050 Ti, will not require 6 pin connector, and will give slightly higher performance than GTX 1060 6 GB offered. No word on GDDR memory bandwidth and bus width. Pricing will be around 149-169$, tho.
That is pretty great perspective. Intel i7 7700T plus GTX 2050 Ti can be very efficient 1440p computer.
It depends on end product TDP, but I will say - yes.Any word on form factor - single slot?
Why would what you are writing disprove that I have sources?Considering 1050Ti doesn't require power connector, and has slightly higher performance than 960, it is safe to assume that it will again be the case with 2050ti.
Stop pretending like you have like some kind of insider sources please, it only destroys your credibility.
Any word on form factor - single slot?