Send a file over bluetooth? Yep:
itunes.apple.com/us/app/bluetooth-u/id526268815?mt=8
[/quote
Yet another half-baked workaround. What happens if that person doesn't have that app downloaded? Now they have to go download it just so they can receive the file? Not exactly impressive.
WiFi direct: Coming in the next iPhone, but unnecessary. Never met or seen anyone actually use that.
Again, you're speculating that it's coming. They didn't include it in the 4S, yet you're sure they will include it in the next iteration? How can you be so sure? They never included DLNA, yet you think they will include wifi direct. Doubt it, but hey, hang on to hope...in the meantime....iOS doesn't have the feature.
PS
It's not in iOS 6 at all, so you're better off hoping for it in iOS 7.
I see you love these half-baked work-arounds. That doesn't manage data use at all. That just tells you your data use. It doesn't give you any sort of way to restrict your data use. You can't limit the amount of data your phone can use, you can't control what apps use data or not, it has no control at all. That's not a data manager, that's a data viewer. A data manager allows me to actually manage how my data is being consumed, and how much is being consumed.
Have an app use background data? That just uses up battery life and uses up your data.
So now background data is a bad thing because iOS doesn't do it? Come on now, you're REALLY reaching there. Funny thing is my GS3 gets better battery life than my 4S did, and my GS3 has background data...
Facial recognition? Explain how this would be useful / make something easier to do.
It can make sharing easier. Instead of having to look up a person's contact to send them a particular thing, the phone already recognizes them in the picture and allows you to share it with them with one touch. It's a convenience thing. Also, there are more and more things being developed that utilize facial recognition. For example, now there's face unlock with blink detection. That's more secure than the first face unlock, because you can't use a picture. Facial recognition is an innovation that can be built upon.
Back to this bump thing huh? I'll steal your little reach from earlier....what if you don't have a signal? ....I guess then it's back to manual input for you huh? lol
----------
The iPhone is for the mainstream consumer and this is obvious. If you feel the need to change the ISO (most don't even know what this is) or for some reason change the MP the picture is, you need a DSLR or any camera that's not a phone. It's obvious the iPhone still takes amazing pictures without all that nonsense.
I need a DSLR if I don't want to take a large picture? So if I have no need for my picture to be 8mp, and instead want it at 5mp, I should use a DSLR?! That's some kind of silly logic you're got there. So if I want to change the ISO so I get a better picture, I should use a DSLR?! I'm sorry but that notion is just plain asinine. The iPhone doesn't always take great pictures, and it could benefit from the ISO being able to be adjusted. Here's an example of a picture in the dark. Notice how the iPhone's picture looks much worse due to the ISO setting the camera chose. It got outdone by the Galaxy Nexus' camera simply because the iPhone couldn't set the correct ISO automatically and has no way to do it manually.