Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
OK, I'm going for the 2014 mini
- Thread starter mogens
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
- Status
It only took reading to the end of a sentence to make thoseonly applicable to your attempt at sarcasm. I'll highlight it for you…
Ah, I guess you had a hard time understanding my point. But then again, maybe you work for
and have an inside track that none of the rest of us have...and maybe you KNOW for a FACT that this is coming. Keep fishing, you're bound to catch that elusive 2014 Haswell mini sooner or later.....and I'm sure it will blow the top off of a nMP, and (by that assumption) every other computer makes. Which means you are not only misleading people on stock I/O options for the mini, but also on the processor that it offers.
Last edited:
Ah, I guess you had a hard time understanding my point. But then again, maybe you work for
Absolutely not, how could you (or anyone else) possibly misinterpret anything I said to reach that rediculous conclusion? Simply look at the performance of Haswell based Macs to their previous models, look at the CPU-only performance of the quad Mac Pro, then reach your own conclusions about which system offers the most power for the least outlay.
At NO POINT have I or anyone else flat out claimed to know when Apple will update the currently 2 year old Mac Mini to share the Haswell CPUs of the Macbook Pros of 2013. There's only speculation that based on every other iteration of the Mac Mini, they will at some stage.
Which means you are not only misleading people on stock I/O options for the mini, but also on the processor that it offers.
I can edit my posts too. It's your failure to read for comprehension that's misleading your interpretation of what I was clearly stating in the first instance. I know your type. born right, can't withstanding criticism, can't even maintain any consistency to the point they're trying to make, just need to be right all the time no matter how much they have to twist what others say to convince themselves they are.
Last edited:
dell
wouldn't be so proud about dell. Bought a dell u2711 two years ago. Will get exchanged soon. Already a prob in 2 years time. Ok, dell swaps it with a refurbished one. Given dell charged 300 euro for the guarantee you'd expect a new device instead of a used one. And I'm disregarding now the ups - bull s*** which can deliver any time of the day. It also takes them 2 days: one to deliver the refurbished, the second to pick up my old screen. So I'd consider another brand to hook up to my mini...
wouldn't be so proud about dell. Bought a dell u2711 two years ago. Will get exchanged soon. Already a prob in 2 years time. Ok, dell swaps it with a refurbished one. Given dell charged 300 euro for the guarantee you'd expect a new device instead of a used one. And I'm disregarding now the ups - bull s*** which can deliver any time of the day. It also takes them 2 days: one to deliver the refurbished, the second to pick up my old screen. So I'd consider another brand to hook up to my mini...
Your lack of comprehension is borderline ludicrous and completely misguided. I can take criticism when it's warranted and correct. You are the one who obviously has to have the last word. Not sure what you mean about editing posts....that part of my comment was there from the beginning. So I reckon it's someone else who has a reading comprehension disorder. Tell you what, just drop it because you're obviously so wrong on the point. The Mac mini can't touch the nMP in any stock configuration. And anything you do to a mini to help it's cause can be done on the pro, so that's a wash too. You've already been corrected about your inability to understand nand density, but you choose to ignore that and continue to attack me. This will, no questions asked, be my last post on the subject. So you, sir, go ahead and throw one last stone to make yourself feel good. To the op...the mini is a great machine, enjoy it.
How can you lie so blatantly and still think you've got something to prove?
1. 1 hit quote. As ALWAYS it quotes YOUR ENTIRE REPLY.
2. On posting the quote after writing a reply to it. I notice OBVIOUSLY that you've added an extra bit of arrogance at the end of the post I quoted.
3. I edited my response, taking into account YOUR EDIT.
Hint: When it says, "Last edited by CH12671; Yesterday at 04:06 PM.", I don't think you can deny your edit to anyone. I quoted your edit when I edited my own response to it.
I can't believe you're still running your ego off even now. Give it rest and get a life. There is no LAST WORD, only a concluded point which you refuse to accept because I guess YOU want the last word.
Meanwhile, some people are starving, fleeing countries from war, being killed. Mind you, they're probably trying to log on here to see who edited who's post, misquoted something etc.
- Status