Yeah. No way I'm going to buy a MacBook without a tandem oled screen.When OLED MacBook Pro?
Yeah. No way I'm going to buy a MacBook without a tandem oled screen.When OLED MacBook Pro?
I love my Macbook Pro, really, the last 14 and 16" are the best computer I ever owned.When OLED MacBook Pro?
Skip both and buy a Vision Pro. Nothing beats that for content
sigh.So I just picked up the new M4 iPad Pro with that OLED display everyone’s been raving about. At first I wasn't that impressed about it until I watched HDR content on it. Let me tell you, it’s stunning, in fact, that it has completely ruined my TV with HDR content.
I was perfectly happy with my home theater setup, but nooooo, the M4 iPad Pro just had to flex on my TV. So guess I have to drop $3000 on a new LG OLED TV due to this iPad.
the vision pro is not a public device. It’s something you use at home, who gives a **** what you look like? It’s not like it even looks bad. People walk around now with those big goofy headphones in the age of AirPodsUntil you have social circles or start caring how you appear to others.
Some people care about sound quality. AirPods are nowhere near where some other headphones are. And yes, size doesn't really matter.the vision pro is not a public device. It’s something you use at home, who gives a **** what you look like? It’s not like it even looks bad. People walk around now with those big goofy headphones in the age of AirPods
We're talking past each other. There's the display panel and then there's the technology supporting the viewing experience on that display panel. Those are different things. If you watched a movie streaming with much motion on a tandem OLED screen versus a Sony or Samsung QD-OLED, even in a bright room, the TVs will win hands-down, despite being ~300 nits full screen brightness versus ~1000 nits on the iPad.Thats your opinion which is fine, but the Tandem OLED display is considered in the industry as the best display available right now. There is no OLED display that can match the sustained brightness levels and Apple themselves market it as the most ‘advanced ‘ display, so take that as you will.
We're talking past each other. There's the display panel and then there's the technology supporting the viewing experience on that display panel. Those are different things. If you watched a movie streaming with much motion on a tandem OLED screen versus a Sony or Samsung QD-OLED, even in a bright room, the TVs will win hands-down, despite being ~300 nits full screen brightness versus ~1000 nits on the iPad.
Ultimately I guess this is just semantics around the word "advanced" and what exactly we're referring to when we apply that adjective. And you really can't compare TVs to mobile devices here. They're optimized for different stuff. But I'm the one who raised all this to begin with, so that's on me.
the vision pro is not a public device. It’s something you use at home, who gives a **** what you look like? It’s not like it even looks bad. People walk around now with those big goofy headphones in the age of AirPods
He also bought a new TV because the new screen of the iPad Pro made his TV look bad.why did it cost that much? guessing you want for high storage?