Excellent! I love that team!iWorks support have responded and asked if they can get in touch for more information. Of course I said they could.
Excellent! I love that team!iWorks support have responded and asked if they can get in touch for more information. Of course I said they could.
Thank you!FWIW, I opened it on my Studio 64/2, and it's quite fluid.
btw, that's some really nice work . . . your dedication to detail seasons my appreciation with a large dash of envy
Thank you!
I've had the basic information in Word documents for a few years now. Gathering it all together took a LOT of effort.
But switching to Pages has been interesting with much to appreciate. And not so hard as the original creation. But changing from A4 to A5 meant a lot of rethinklng. However, it is much more viewable on smaller devices.
Some of this is the information many need. And you simply cannot expect people who are ill, possible suffering what we call "brain fog", along with multiple physical symptoms, to work their way round the internet finding it. Still less as many are towards the computer illiterate end of the scale.
Aye; no surprise there, really!
I still use Word, on occasion; but those days are numbered. I just don't really need it anymore.
Curious: A5 is half of A4 . . . how was it adifficulttime-intensive process?
Thyroid can be derived from basidiomycetes?!? I never woulda thunk it 🤷♂️
Two reasons I find it difficult to get away from Word: Familiarity and a significant number of documents complex enough to make conversion to anything else less than satisfactory.
Yes, A5 is half A4, but I had to rethink the layout completely. Also - as I was doing it, I tried to make products align with pages, make headers more obvious/visible when scrolling or using Table of Contents on a small screen, etc. And revised overall organisation (i.e. number of documents and contents of each one).
I look at thyroid as being ultimately derived from the need for extremely primitive organisms to avoid poisoning by iodine. That need has been there since the first microorganisms came into being. Some form of iodine binding was an answer. And that bound iodine then very slowly developed into something that could be exploited. Whether as a way of moving iodine around cells, and later multicellular organisms, without damaging themselves, using iodine to kill invasive organisms, or acting as a messenger, or supporting some chemical reactions and synthesis.
Thus pre-thyroid iodine pathways have existed pretty much throughout life - across all kingdoms. Some of them result in compounds that are similar to actual mammalian thyroid hormones, or are precursors of them. And the genetic makeup that handles iodine and thyroid is incredibly well conserved.
I simply provide a link to a PDF! Then they do as they wish. I know a large proportion use smart phones (I think around 80% of activity on a thyroid forum is from such devices) but no idea how many also have tablets, laptops, desktops.I infer from this that you are exporting to (responsive-HTML-intended) mobile devices?
Have you achieved more satisfactory performance and operation, since your initial post?
This!
Thank you for sharing
[OT]
I read someone's blog--somewhere in the past few years--where they (they, who say things) asserted that their health greatly benefited from switching from the supposedly-pure salts of the Himalayas back to regular-ole iodide-infused salts.
I, myself, am not a regular user of salts in any of my cooking. I do, however, employ any form of basidio is said cooking.
oops!@ . . . I just now realised that helvella crispa is an ascomycete 🧐
Well, you've certainly got me obsessing on the "Learning More" path, polyphenol!
Pages is still falling over. Three times yesterday. And I am as sure as I can be that it is related to mouse wheel scrolling. (That doesn't, of course, preclude other scrolling also causing it.)
Sent lots of info to Apple. And obsessively save now!
But despite research, there still seems little good science on which to base changes to iodine intake except towards the extremes.
I'm not aware of having done anything "odd" or special. I think both arrived as Monterey and updated in the usual fashion to Ventura and Sonoma. Nothing else looks at all questionable or odd.Any modifications to your Mac or MacOS? OCLP specifically? I've got a Late-2012 27" iMac w/ 3.4GHz Quad-Core i7 running OCLP Ventura that crashes whenever I try to insert a picture into Pages (or any iWork app). Otherwise it's a very stable system.
From where I am, with iWorks team investigating, I'll see what they come up with.Yeah; we are amidst the blue-birds, in such territory!
My first experience post-Monterey is with Sonoma on the Mac Studio M2-Max.
This was the default installation.
I have noticed (here @MR (and elsewhere)) more complaints/problems with transitional installations (e.g., 'Monterey -> Ventura -> Sonoma'; or, 'Ventura -> Sonoma').
Is it within your capacity/perview to initialise a new install of Sonoma?
I used to 'upgrade' my systems back in the day, but--as I have come to find--having all "My Precious" stuff in iCloud relegates Migration to as moot a point as a moot point can be
There are only so many hours in a day; and--of course--these things, suggestively, are supposed to "just work"....
From where I am, with iWorks team investigating, I'll see what they come up with.
I'm a relatively new convert to macOS so not keen on doing things like new installs. I just don't feel confident and am all too aware how easy it is to miss things when trying to do so.