Extra cost in developing the solution?Any idea on what those reasons might be?
Has any one connected a DSC display that uses more than HBR2 to a Mac yet?
DSC is supposed to be visually lossless. Apple uses it on XDR and Studio display. No-one has complained about visual-quality issues with DSC. Has anyone tried doing a comparison of DSC and non-DSC? The issue (if any) can't be seen as easily as with compression from chroma sub sampling 4:2:0.Even if they could build a dual-tile display that requires DSC to be used with TB3/4, might Apple not want to build it for visual-quality reasons?
XDR uses HBR2 + DSC for GPUs that have DSC.For instance, they could have driven the XDR without having to bother with dual-tile HBR3 if they had used DSC, yet they chose not to. Could that have been because they thought DSC might interfere with critical color-grading work? [Not that the monitor is quite capable of that—it doesn't meet Dolby Vision certification requirements for use as an HDR mastering monitor—but that may have been Apple's aspiration when they designed it.]
XDR uses dual HBR3 for GPUs that don't have DSC.
The former allows writing to USB devices at 5 Gbps. The latter will only allow writing to USB devices at USB 2 speed (480 Mbps) or maybe 1 Gbps (I haven't seen anyone test this).